Hi Jim, I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the significant performance decline: https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline
Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. Thanks and cheers, Johannes On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what > information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. > > I'll report back. > > - Johannes > > On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure it > > out? > > > Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation > > like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the > > edge. > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving > > > the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need > > > about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and > > > snippets. > > > > Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this > > > performance impact? > > > > Thanks and cheers, > > > > Johannes > > > -- > > Jim Gay > > Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com > > 571-403-0338
