It's clearly the new Ragel Radius parser: https://github.com/radiant/radiant/issues/247#issuecomment-1578856
On Jul 13, 2:28 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim, > > if you can point me in the right direction I can look at this myself, > too. > > Cheers, > > Johannes > > On Jul 11, 2:31 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > No problem, I hope it helps! I just tried it with 1.0RC2: Same thing. > > 460k take almost 10 seconds to render. > > > On Jul 11, 2:23 pm, Jim Gay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together. > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Jim, > > > > > I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the > > > > significant performance > > > > decline:https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline > > > > > Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering > > > > the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). > > > > > I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. > > > > > Thanks and cheers, > > > > > Johannes > > > > > On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Jim, > > > > >> thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what > > > >> information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. > > > > >> I'll report back. > > > > >> - Johannes > > > > >> On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help > > > >> > figure it out? > > > > >> > Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a > > > >> > situation > > > >> > like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the > > > >> > edge. > > > > >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > Hi, > > > > >> > > we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're > > > >> > > moving > > > >> > > the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need > > > >> > > about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and > > > >> > > snippets. > > > > >> > > Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this > > > >> > > performance impact? > > > > >> > > Thanks and cheers, > > > > >> > > Johannes > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Jim Gay > > > >> > Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com > > > >> > 571-403-0338 > > > > -- > > > Jim Gay > > > Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com > > > 571-403-0338
