No problem, I hope it helps! I just tried it with 1.0RC2: Same thing. 460k take almost 10 seconds to render.
On Jul 11, 2:23 pm, Jim Gay <j...@saturnflyer.com> wrote: > Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together. > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > > > > > > > > > <jfahrenk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > > I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the > > significant performance > > decline:https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline > > > Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering > > the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). > > > I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. > > > Thanks and cheers, > > > Johannes > > > On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug <jfahrenk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jim, > > >> thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what > >> information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. > > >> I'll report back. > > >> - Johannes > > >> On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay <j...@saturnflyer.com> wrote: > > >> > I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure > >> > it out? > > >> > Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation > >> > like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the > >> > edge. > > >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug > > >> > <jfahrenk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving > >> > > the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need > >> > > about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and > >> > > snippets. > > >> > > Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this > >> > > performance impact? > > >> > > Thanks and cheers, > > >> > > Johannes > > >> > -- > >> > Jim Gay > >> > Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com > >> > 571-403-0338 > > -- > Jim Gay > Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com > 571-403-0338