> I've found Lucent to be the best with modem code and performance. Some may
> disagree I'm not interested in an argument I own these three brands and I'm
> going on my personal experience dialling into them and from customer support
> calls.
Need to be more specific. Ciscos with MICA, or Cisco's with Microcom?
The Microcom stuff kicks serious butt over Lucent modem code in my use.
I'm willing to believe that you see different results downunder than
you get in the US. In the US, on a "standard" 5ess switch, Lucent
modem code sucks like a vacuum compared to Cisco/mcom :)
I think the PM3 is faster throughput, but I don't have customers
calling to complain about throughput being 2% slower, but they sure
do like to call when they can't connect.
That Bay stuff has got to be crap :) I don't need to drive my car
into a tree to imagine what would happen to me :)
Chris
> Others, I can't really compare. I don't trust anyone who has only used one
> type of access server and happens to say their one is the best, it could
> well be the best however how have they compared their one to others?
>
> Order of my personal preference:
>
> 1. Lucent
> 2. Cisco
> 3. Bay
>
> BTW: None are perfect, I can find modems that will not connect to each one
> of these, but between the 3 brands and some modem tweaking I can get nearly
> all clients online, if I can't their modem is usually stuffed or will only
> connect to analog access servers (Usually a V.FC modem).
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Leigh Spiegel
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
