Billy,

 

Excellent thoughts.  Policy not based on sound research is a pathway to
failure.  We run into trouble when our decision makers rely on biased
information, false data, Ouija board consultation, or emotional fervor,

 

An interesting development in recent years is policy-by-the-polls.
Legitimate survey techniques, widely practiced, have given use regular
access to public opinion.  Research-based data from the polls change the
action and rhetoric of politicians.  This is a double-edged sword conundrum.
The frequent polls create a more quasi-democratic society.  No longer do we
have to wait for an election to get a quantitative pulse of public opinion.
The problem is that day-to-day public opinion is largely based on sound bite
news and Internet clips that are unbalanced and poorly researched.

 

Because I do investigative work for a living, I know that an initial
interview from one perspective can convincingly tell a story (shiningly
presented on, say, a TV screen).  But on further review and after much more
data collection, the initial presentation turned out to be badly misleading
and one-sided.  The public is left with the first impression, and that is
what shows up in the polls.

 

What the country needs is more thoughtful discourse at a deeper level (like
on this list).  Unfortunately, with the Twitterization of our media and
society, we seem to be headed the other direction.

 

Chris   

 

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [RC] The Value of Research

 

The Value of Research

 

There is no profession that does not rely on research to validate what it is

responsible for doing. None at all, whether discussing medicine, the
military

( which, since Viet Nam, has placed high priority on higher education for
all officers, 

hence colonels and generals with degrees from Princeton or Yale ), business

and hence the growing importance of top business schools, social science
such

as the work done in analyzing population data by the Census Bureau, and 

on and on through a list of thousands of occupations. This extends to the

most common-sense of areas of expertise, to auto mechanics who need

to hit the books and learn how computer systems in cars function, to

farmers who research soils and hydrology, and to policemen who need

to study such subjects as crowd control, forensics, and ballistics.

 

After all, what is the alternative ?  No research ?  Where is that kind of
approach

viable anywhere in modern society ?  Nowhere except when there is a question

of public opinion, or so it seems. About politics, while millions do make an
effort

to become informed ( another term for research ),  other millions derive
just about

all of their opinions from other uninformed people, or based on nothing so
much

as values they learned in childhood. In what way is this a "good" ?

 

Which is why Radical Centrists generally take the view that uniformed
opinions

have no intrinsic value. After all, most of us are professionals of one kind
or

another and we all are well aware that research has great value. Plus, some
of 

us have written books or professional articles. Any kind of serious writing
demands

competent research skills, no matter what else may be involved in writing
such as

sense of style or skill at narrative descriptions. Some are involved in
professional

societies, all of which place a premium on solid research. Otherwise they
would

not be professional.

 

Finally, consider any issue on which you take a stand. Any issue at all. How
can

anyone know that his or her opinions are valid without some serious study ?

Without it what one has is guesswork, or the alternative of repeating
someone

else's views and hoping that those views are true and can stand tests that

others may ask for if their agreement is desired. 

 

It would do everyone a lot of good, of course, to have some "existential
interests,"

to have friends in the real world, to create adventures for yourself by
hiking in

the outdoors, to explore the nearest mountain when there is a chance to do
so,

to seek out the seashore, to take calculated risks when circumstances
warrant,

for instance, speaking out at a community meeting. But about these kinds of
things, 

mostly these words consist of preaching to the choir. 

 

That is, we need to be flesh and blood caring human beings ; all research

and no existentialism, so to speak, and life is only part of what it can be,

and personality pays the price ;  insights may be lost, awareness of entire

categories of reality can pass you by,  and perspective  --what is really

important and what is not--   is compromised. None of which anyone here

wants to see happen. Or so it seems to me from our many 

e-mail conversations over the years.

 

Yet when all is said, research is essential. It is safe to say that everyone
also

takes pride in the kinds of research they carry out, whether research needed

for computer programming, or for data analysis to use for customer service

purposes, or for making political judgements, and many other things.

 

Which is one reason why we sometimes are highly critical of journalists

who don't do the research they are responsible for but fail to do, and

similarly with respect to poorly informed politicians.

 

In all of this there is no libidinal contest, or competition among egos.

We want to do our best, and to the extent there is competition it almost

always is for the purpose of being smarter and more well-informed than

those who's views outside the group we are challenging. After all, while

we all have our election-to-election preferences, by and large we take

the view that both Democrats and Republicans, and others, can be

and often are  flat out wrong about any number of topics and issues.

We feel confident in our views precisely because, as much as it is

practical to do so, our opinions are researched.

 

 

Billy R.

November 17, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to