The Value of Research
 
There is no profession that does not rely on research to validate what it  
is
responsible for doing. None at all, whether discussing medicine, the  
military
( which, since Viet Nam, has placed high priority on higher education for  
all officers, 
hence colonels and generals with degrees from Princeton or Yale ),  business
and hence the growing importance of top business schools, social science  
such
as the work done in analyzing population data by the Census Bureau, and 
on and on through a list of thousands of occupations. This extends to  the
most common-sense of areas of expertise, to auto mechanics who need
to hit the books and learn how computer systems in cars function, to
farmers who research soils and hydrology, and to policemen who need
to study such subjects as crowd control, forensics, and  ballistics.
 
After all, what is the alternative ?  No research ?  Where is  that kind of 
approach
viable anywhere in modern society ?  Nowhere except when there is a  
question
of public opinion, or so it seems. About politics, while millions do make  
an effort
to become informed ( another term for research ),  other millions  derive 
just about
all of their opinions from other uninformed people, or based on nothing so  
much
as values they learned in childhood. In what way is this a "good" ?
 
Which is why Radical Centrists generally take the view that uniformed  
opinions
have no intrinsic value. After all, most of us are professionals of one  
kind or
another and we all are well aware that research has great value. Plus, some 
 of 
us have written books or professional articles. Any kind of serious writing 
 demands
competent research skills, no matter what else may be involved in writing  
such as
sense of style or skill at narrative descriptions. Some are involved  in 
professional
societies, all of which place a premium on solid research. Otherwise they  
would
not be professional.
 
Finally, consider any issue on which you take a stand. Any issue at all.  
How can
anyone know that his or her opinions are valid without some serious study  ?
Without it what one has is guesswork, or the alternative of repeating  
someone
else's views and hoping that those views are true and can stand tests  that
others may ask for if their agreement is desired. 
 
It would do everyone a lot of good, of course, to have some "existential  
interests,"
to have friends in the real world, to create adventures for yourself by  
hiking in
the outdoors, to explore the nearest mountain when there is a chance to do  
so,
to seek out the seashore, to take calculated risks when circumstances  
warrant,
for instance, speaking out at a community meeting. But about these kinds of 
 things, 
mostly these words consist of preaching to the choir. 
 
That is, we need to be flesh and blood caring human beings  ; all research
and no existentialism, so to speak, and life is only part of what it can  
be,
and personality pays the price ;  insights may be  lost, awareness of entire
categories of reality can pass you by,  and perspective   --what is really
important and what is not--   is compromised. None of which  anyone here
wants to see happen. Or so it seems to me from our many 
e-mail conversations over the years.
 
Yet when all is said, research is essential. It is safe to say that  
everyone also
takes pride in the kinds of research they carry out, whether research  
needed
for computer programming, or for data analysis to use for customer  service
purposes, or for making political judgements, and many other things.
 
Which is one reason why we sometimes are highly critical of  journalists
who don't do the research they are responsible for but fail to do,  and
similarly with respect to poorly informed politicians.
 
In all of this there is no libidinal contest, or competition among  egos.
We want to do our best, and to the extent there is competition it  almost
always is for the purpose of being smarter and more well-informed  than
those who's views outside the group we are challenging. After all,  while
we all have our election-to-election preferences, by and large we  take
the view that both Democrats and Republicans, and others, can be
and often are  flat out wrong about any number of topics and  issues.
We feel confident in our views precisely because, as much as it is
practical to do so, our opinions are researched.
 
 
Billy R.
November 17, 2011
 
 
 
 
 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to