Mike :
Are you sure you want to go with a static  model ?
 
How about a model based on 2 different  factors , with the static model as 
a sort
of baseline ?
 
( 1 )  That is, and I don't know  IF this can be quantified in any 
meaningful way, but
what is the potential of each candidate's  ideas ? That is, think of 
politics as war.
Who is the best general ?  Who can  outthink the others best ?  Who can 
come up
with the best strategy and make it work  ?  A corollary is to think of  
politics as a 
free-for-all kick boxing match. If that is  what things are like on more 
than one  level, 
who stands the best chance ? Nixon was  good at this sort of thing. In a 
way 
you could say something similar for GWB  and for his daddy in 88.
 
( 2 )  Momentum. Who is the best  "jockey" when things start to break one 
way
or the other ?  Or to switch  metaphor, who can think on his / her feet the 
best ?
These were RR and Clinton  strengths.
 
 
But you're absolutely right about RP and  Goldwater numbers.  Even that 
might 
be optimistic. He might get McGovern  numbers.
 
My thoughts on the subject
 
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
12/23/2011 11:55:16 A.M. Pacific Standard  Time, [email protected] 
writes:

Just as a side-note, if I were a gambling man and  had to rank
electability of the GOP candidates vs. Obama, it would probably  be as
follows:

1. Jon Huntsman 50-50
2. Mitt Romney 50-50
3.  Rick Perry 45-55
4. Newt Gingrich 42-58
5. Rick Santorum 40-60
6.  Michele Bachmann 40-60
7. Ron Paul 35-65

I looked at elections since  1964 to get these numbers.  Paul would get
Goldwater-level support,  Santorum, Bachman, and Gingrich would pull
Bob Dole numbers, and Perry  could pull together a W-like coalition. I
think Romney and Huntsman would  run even with or just slightly ahead
of Obama right out of the gate, as  they've been careful about not
alienating moderates.  This election  will be all about moderates and
independents, which Ron Paul would never be  able to gain a plurality
of, as he can't even grab enough of his own  party.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group:  http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and  blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to