Hi Billy,

On Mar 22, 2012, at 7:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Coming from a Baptist background, also with Lutheran and Buddhist experiences
> that have shaped my understanding,  and more could be added, my standards for
> what constitutes valid prophetism are "high bar," to use that metaphor.
>  
> My experience with Charismatic / Bible church prophetism in action is very 
> limited
> and, from it, is essentially negative. By way of comparison, today's "church 
> prophets"
> strike me as similar to a shop keeper who goes into politics, or a dentist, 
> or a
> high school teacher. In either case it is something that one makes up as one
> goes along. And, allowing for special exceptions, I have extreme difficulty
> in accepting  any such thing. Amateur hour in politics has no more appeal
> than amateur hour in matters of faith , at least concerning such matters
> that effect whole congregations or whole populations.

Obviously I have a very different perspective. :-)


> Hence my criticisms of LDS doctrine that holds that all male heads of families
> are "prophets."  Sure they are ,    and being a lifelong rancher prepares one 
> for
> being a prophet how ?  Or for that matter a lifelong banker or lifelong 
> salesman.
> Same exact principle for Bible churches, etc.

Ah, *here* I agree with you. I believe the prophetic gift is something given by 
God, not by fiat. Entrusting that power and authority to individuals by virtue 
of their *position* -- rather than a recognized calling and gifting -- is 
dangerous in the extreme.

> My standard is Old Testament or, cie vous plait, Zoroastrian --in which 
> genuine
> prophets , or prophetesses, are uncommon in any population.

Sure.  But we have a lot more people than Israel did, so even if you assumed 
the same ration the absolute number would be quite high.


> Not sure exactly how best to read the Apostle Paul on this issue. At times
> he seems to affirm the "Charismatic" position, yet taking a very dim view
> of glossolalia, but at other times his standards seem to be consistent
> with the views in the Hebrew Bible / OT. In any case, while I make allowances
> for exceptions, basically I am OT about this.
>  
> A genuine prophet has to go through a helluva lot of bad stuff to be
> taken seriously, has to persevere, and has to not only have a powerful
> moral message, but an original message that contributes to knowledge.
> Simply expressing inner spiritual feelings doesn't begin to cut it.

I'm with you on that.

-- Ernie P.

>  
> My view, anyway
> Billy
> 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to