Hanson's description of the problems of on-campus college education
probably is on target. But is his prognosis correct?  I don't  think so.
All it would take to prove him wrong would be one (1) new model
of a college that actually works, based on various new principles, and the 
game would be over for the old system  -not the colleges  themselves-
to make way for a reformation in higher ed.
 
Billy
 


The Decline of College
By _Victor Davis Hanson_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/victor_davis_hanson/)  - September 
19,  2013 

_www.realclearpolitics.com_ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com) 
 
For  the last 70 years, American higher education was assumed to be the 
pathway to  upward mobility and a rich shared-learning experience. Young 
Americans for four  years took a common core of classes, learned to look at the 
world  dispassionately, and gained the concrete knowledge to make informed 
arguments  logically.

 
 
The result was a more skilled workforce and a competent democratic 
citizenry.  That ideal may still be true at our flagship universities, with 
their 
enormous  endowments and stellar world rankings. Yet most everywhere else, 
something went  terribly wrong with that model. Almost all the old campus 
protocols are now  tragically outdated or antithetical to their original  
mission. 





 
Tenure — virtual lifelong job security for full-time faculty after six 
years  — was supposed to protect free speech on campus. How, then, did campus 
ideology  become more monotonous than diverse, more intolerant of politically 
unpopular  views than open-minded? Universities have so little job 
flexibility that  campuses cannot fire the incompetent tenured or hire 
full-time 
competent  newcomers. 
The university is often a critic of private enterprise for its supposed  
absence of fairness and equality. The contemporary campus, however, is far 
more  exploitative. It pays part-time faculty far less for the same work than 
it pays  an aristocratic class of fully tenured professors with the same  
degrees. 
The four-year campus experience is simply vanishing. At the California 
State  University system, the largest university complex in the world, well 
under 20  percent of students graduate in four years despite massive student 
aid. Fewer  than half graduate in six years. 
Administrators used to come from among the top faculty, who rotated a few  
years from teaching and scholarship to do the unenviable nuts-and-bolts work 
of  running the university. Now, administrators rarely, if ever, teach. 
Instead,  they became part of a high-paid, careerist professional caste — one 
that has  grown exponentially. In the CSU system, their numbers have exploded 
in recent  years — a 221 percent increase from 1975 to 2008. There are now 
more  administrators in that system than full-time faculty. 
College acceptance was supposed to be a reward for hard work and proven  
excellence in high school, not a guaranteed entitlement of open admission. Yet 
 more than half of incoming first-year students require remediation in math 
and  English during, rather than before attending, college. That may 
explain why six  years and hundreds of millions of dollars later, about the 
same 
number never  graduate. 
The idea of deeply indebted college students in their 20s without degrees 
or  even traditional reading and writing skills is something relatively new 
in  America. Yet aggregate student debt has reached a staggering $1 trillion. 
More  than half of recent college graduates — who ultimately support the 
huge college  industry — are either unemployed or working in jobs that don’t 
require  bachelor’s degrees. About a quarter of those under 25 are jobless 
and still  seeking employment. 
Apart from our elite private schools, the picture of our postmodern campus  
that emerges is one of increasing failure — a perception hotly denied on 
campus  but matter-of-factly accepted off campus, where most of the reforms 
will have to  originate. 
What might we expect in the future? Even more online courses will entice  
students away from campuses through taped lectures from top teachers, 
together  with interactive follow-ups from teaching assistants — all at a 
fraction 
of  current tuition costs. Technical schools that dispense with therapeutic, 
 hyphenated “studies” courses will offer students marketable skills far 
more  cheaply and efficiently. Periodic teaching contracts, predicated on 
meeting  teaching and research obligations, will probably replace lifelong 
tenure. 
Public attitudes will also probably change. The indebted social-science 
major  in his mid-20s with or without a diploma will not enjoy the old cachet 
accorded  a college-educated elite — at least in comparison with the 
debt-free, fully  employed, and higher-paid electrician, plumber, or skilled 
computer programmer  without a college degree. 
Real skills will matter more than mere college attendance or a brand. New  
competency in national tests in math, science, and English will be 
considered by  employers to be a far better barometer of past achievement and 
future 
potential  than the mere possession of a now-suspect university transcript. 
As in any revolution, much good will be lost along with the bad. The  
traditional university used to offer a holistic four-year experience for  
motivated and qualified students in a landscape of shared inquiry and 
tolerance.  
The Internet and for-profit trade schools can never replace that unique  
intellectual and social landscape. 
Yet because professors of the traditional arts and sciences could or would  
not effectively defend their disciplines or the classical university 
system,  agenda-driven politicians, partisan ideologues, and careerist 
technocrats 
 absorbed them. 
The college experience morphed into a costly sort of prolonged adolescence, 
a  political arena and a social laboratory — something quite different from 
a  serious place to acquire both practical and humanistic knowledge. 
No wonder that it is now financially unsustainable and going the way of  
the dinosaurs


-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to