BR note:
Inexplicably the title for Ali Sina's essay in opposition to the Islamic  
State
and in criticism of Obama's wildly inaccurate views of Islam was given 
the title:  Ali Sina: In Defense of  Islamic State
This is grossly misleading since it suggests that Ali Sina
favors the Muslim terrorists, which is absurd. For purposes here
a different title has been made use of.
 
 
Atlas Shrugs
September 30, 2014
 
 
Ali Sina: What is wrong with  the Islamic State
and Obama's views of Islam
 

 
In his speech addressed to the UN general assembly, Barak Hussein Obama 
said,  “ISIL is not Islamic. No religion condones killing innocents.” He also 
stated,  “ISIS is hiding behind a false Islam.” We know about Mr. Obama’s 
admiration for  Islam.  The following are a few of his statements: 
·         “The sweetest sound I know  is the Muslim call to prayer.” 
·         “We will convey our deep  appreciation for the Islamic faith, 
which has done so much over the centuries to  shape the world — including in my 
own country” (i.e., USA, not Kenya). 
·         “Islam has a proud  tradition of tolerance.” 
·         “Islam is not part of the  problem in combating violent extremism 
– it is an important part of promoting  peace.” 
·         “Ramadan is a celebration  of _a faith known for  great diversity 
and racial equality_ (http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=15101) .” 
·         “I look forward to hosting  an Iftar dinner celebrating Ramadan 
here at the White House.” 
In addition to the above, he has also made many unfounded statements such 
as,  “Islam has always been a part of America’s story.” And “In  ancient 
times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of  
innovation and education.” 
Does Obama really know Islam better than Muslims? 
If Islam is as wonderful as Obama says, why did he leave it? He did leave  
Islam, didn’t he? He _was  raised Muslim_ 
(http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/11/obama-my-muslim-faith/?page=all)
  and, therefore, it seems 
strange that one could have such a  high admiration of a religion that one no 
longer believes in. 
It is also quite strange that Obama does not seem to have the same 
admiration  for the faith that he now claims to be a part of. He has said with 
sarcasm, 
“Which passages of scripture should guide our public policy?  Should  we go 
with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish  is 
an abomination?  Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests  stoning 
your child if he strays from the faith?”
Of course the Qur’an is full of verses instructing the believers to slay 
the  unbelievers, cut their heads from above their necks and be harsh with 
them. But  Mr. Obama chooses to ignore all that. Instead, he emphasizes, “We do 
not  consider ourselves a Christian nation.” 
Obama’s opinion about Islam is also highly problematic.  ISIS is indeed  
very much Islamic. Al Baqdadi, the self-appointed caliph of Islamic State, 
was,  like Obama, also born and raised as a Muslim, but unlike Obama he has a 
PhD in  Islamic Law. And a great number of Muslims agree with his 
interpretation of  Islam.  _ISIS  is now enjoying increasing shows of 
solidarity from 
the Middle East and from  across the Muslim world – and also from Western 
countries_ 
(http://pamelageller.com/2014/06/muslims-west-express-support-islamic-state-aka-isis.html/)
 .  Watch this  politician on an interview on a 
Jordanian television passionately endorsing IS  while shouting, 
“_There is  nothing such as ‘ISIS ideology’ – It is Islam_ 
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1koyPZ8nlrY#t=33) . … if these Muslims are  
terrorists, I 
salute those terrorists. I salute the Islamic State in Iraq and  Syria.”
These Muslims know their religion. There is nothing that Islamic State is  
doing that is un-Islamic. They follow the Sunnah (examples set by their 
prophet)  to the letter. Muhammad raided villages and towns, destroyed temples, 
massacred  his captives, enslaved and sold their women, tortured his 
enemies, and as he  repeatedly bragged, he cast terror in the hearts of 
unbelievers. 
IS has also been condemned by some Muslims. Take the example of Maqdesi, a  
supporter of the al-Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front, who _criticized the 
Islamic State_ (http://tawhed.ws/pr?i=8325)  group for its  brutal methods. “Is 
this caliphate a sanctuary for the vulnerable and a  refuge for all Muslims, 
or a sword hanging over those Muslims who disagree with  them?” Maqdesi 
asked. 
Maqdesi is not against violence.  He is a terrorist after all. He just  
thinks Muslims should kill non-Muslims and not fellow Muslims.  His  
interpretation is simply different.  According to IS, the Shiites are  heretics 
and 
killing them is justified by the Sunnah.  Muhammad ordered to  burn a mosque 
built in Dhu Awan, a population to the North of Medina, with the  worshipers 
inside, because someone told him the Muslims there are  heretics.  So if the 
Shiites are declared heretics, they should be  killed. 
More than 120 Muslim scholars around the world released a statement  
denouncing ISIS militants as un-Islamic. The statement said, 
“It is forbidden in Islam to torture, to attribute evil acts to God, to  
force people to convert to Islam, to deny women and children of their  rights.”
This sounds hollow to those familiar with the history of early Islam.   
Muhammad tortured his enemies, and he did force people to convert.  Okay,  
maybe I take that back. He actually gave them three choices: Convert to Islam,  
leave the country, or die. 
Muhammad also took women and children as slaves and sold them. He allowed 
his  followers to rape women they had captured in their raids. 
The scholars also criticized the declaration of caliphate by IS: 
“The mere announcement is not enough to establish a caliphate…The concept  
of a caliphate is not legitimate unless it is established by consensus from 
 the Islamic community.”
This is true, but when virtually all caliphs, from Umar onward, received  
their consensus by force and by killing their detractors, we can’t really  
condemn al Baqdadi for doing the same. 
The fact that many Muslims oppose IS does not make IS un-Islamic.  There  
has never been a time in the Islamic annals that Muslims were united.  They  
have always disagreed with each other and, as usual, always shed each other’
s  blood over their disagreements. 
Even though Muslims don’t agree over anything, as long as they believe in  
Muhammad and Allah they are Muslim. Some follow the footsteps of their 
prophet  more closely and others a little less. But they all follow him. IS, al 
Qaida,  Boko Haram and Shabab are a bit stricter in their adherence to the 
Sunnah of  their prophet.  They of course disagree with each other just as 
many  companions of Muhammad did.  One of the biggest wars in early Islam where 
 thousands were killed was the War of Camel between Aisha, the preferred 
wife of  Muhammad and Ali, his cousin and son-in-law.  Sunni Muslims regard 
both  these figures as exemplary salafs. 
In regards to Mr. Obama’s statement that no religion condones killing  
innocents, we must keep in mind that the definition of innocence in Islam is 
not 
 exactly the same as non-Muslims understand it.  According to Muhammad,  
everyone is born Muslim. It is that later in life they reject it. Those who 
are  not Muslim are apostate and as such not innocent.  The word kafir is  
erroneously translated as infidel or unbeliever.  That is not the correct  
translation. Kafir sounds like cover, and it has the same meaning. Kafir is one 
 
who covers the truth — an unbeliever is ignorant. A kafir is one who knows 
the  truth and yet hides it and denies it out of malice. Those who don’t 
believe in  Islam do so because there is sickness in their heart. They are not  
innocent.  So, although it is true that killing the innocent is not  
condoned by any religion, Islam allows it, by taking innocence out of the  
innocent. 
Ali Sina is the author of “Understanding Muhammad and  Muslims.”

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to