I wanna play with it :(

--Rob
Sent from my phone...excuse any typos please!
On Jul 2, 2014 4:12 PM, "Guan Yang" <[email protected]> wrote:

> yes, 30 dBm is 1W.
>
> I have an initial board based on an Atmel SAM D20 microcontroller and
> RFM23BP. I've attached an RTL-SDR screenshot showing it in a CW test
> mode. With simple heatsinking from the PCB through the pad on the
> bottom, it barely gets hot at maximum power.
>
> (I'm running this board at 3.3V, which limits output to 27 dBm according
> to HopeRF.)
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014, at 22:37, Robert Diamond wrote:
> > 30 dBm is 1W, right?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:13 PM, David Reeves <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > You can certainly open the squelch on your end, but at the events I
> was at
> > > recently, folks were able to reliably 'kerchunk' the repeater but not
> > > transmit audio - perhaps the transmitted audio just isn't often enough
> > > under bad conditions to open the repeater squelches, and that we can't
> > > change.
> > >
> > > I have been musing on the possibility of getting around the canyon
> problem
> > > using longer wavelengths. This paper<
> http://images.rfdesign.com/files/4/0499WARNAG36.pdf> suggests
> > > that a Part 15 device could theoretically easily get 10 miles at 1705
> > > kHz/100mW, at least during daylight. But it's very dependent on ground
> wave
> > > and noise floor, so probably it's no good for mobile stations for
> audio.
> > > But just maybe, with a low bandwidth digital mode, it would be enough
> for
> > > short texts, even if the antennas were suboptimal? I saw a video of a
> guy
> > > getting an urban 2 mile range with audio on medium wave AM using one
> of these
> > > kits <http://www.sstran.com/pages/AMT3000/overview.html>. I may get
> one
> > > just for experimentation purposes :)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Guan Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2014, at 20:10, David Reeves wrote:
> > >> > Ok, so is the reasoning here that some kind of direct FSK modulation
> > >> will
> > >> > suffer fewer of the propagation difficulties that we've seen with
> > >> > reception
> > >> > of voice/AFSK?
> > >>
> > >> Yes; certainly on a per-baud basis. I've found that a lot of the time
> > >> under bad propagation situations you can actually hear voices if you
> > >> open the squelch. Something not mediated by the FM voice thing should
> be
> > >> better.
> > >>
> > >> RFM23BP has a best case RX sensitivity of -120dBm, which is well below
> > >> the noise floor at these frequencies. Of course we will have to test
> it.
> > >> But even if propagation is just as terrible as FM voice, it will be
> > >> easier to copy a digital transmission because we can do aggressive
> > >> forward error correction and easily repeat transmissions many times.
> > >>
> > >> It's frustrating to be able to hear that there's *some* voice without
> > >> understanding the words. Also talking to people is horrible even under
> > >> ideal circumstances.
> > >>
> > >> > I'd assume this would be simplex only, which has in fact been by
> far the
> > >> > most reliable over the few small-area (< 3 miles) urban nets I
> attended
> > >> > recently. If we could get up to a 10 mile range somehow with some
> clever
> > >> > digital processing, I'd think that would be very useful indeed for
> us
> > >> > canyon-dwellers - do you think that might be possible?
> > >>
> > >> We could have digipeaters. That alone would help a lot. A 2m or 70cm
> FM
> > >> voice repeater is a big hassle to move around and set up. With a $50
> > >> digipeater we could just plant them in various locations in the field
> > >> and cross our fingers that they won't get stolen - and it won't be a
> > >> huge deal if they are.
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Radio mailing list [email protected]
> > >> https://list.hackmanhattan.com/listinfo/radio
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Radio mailing list [email protected]
> > > https://list.hackmanhattan.com/listinfo/radio
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Radio mailing list [email protected]
> > https://list.hackmanhattan.com/listinfo/radio
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radio mailing list [email protected]
> https://list.hackmanhattan.com/listinfo/radio
>
_______________________________________________
Radio mailing list [email protected]
https://list.hackmanhattan.com/listinfo/radio

Reply via email to