I'm sad to see _why go too. The Poignant Guide single-handedly made me passionate about learning ruby. I printed and bound a copy of it so I could hold it tightly to me all the day long. :)
I hope we hear from him again some day. On 24/08/2009, at 3:36 PM, Jason Nah wrote: > Raises a bigger issue about open source projects and the 'bus' > number they carry. Certainly makes me think twice before I use a > library written by one guy. I have to say I disagree with this. Particularly now that we have tools like git (not that git is unique in this sense, but it is a good example) - by itself, the fact that _why deleted all his public repos doesn't matter. All you need to know is the SHA1 of the tip of each branch. The code is mirrored in countless places; in fact I probably have most of his code on my laptop (at least hpricot and potion). In fact, people have already started maintaining forks of his libraries, and eventually some of those forks will become the de-facto canonical versions. The important thing is that the code, its history, and the history of its development (in mailing lists, etc) is public—whether it was originally written by a company, a bunch of mates, developers scattered across the globe, or a single guy. If I was scraping HTML today, I wouldn't think twice before choosing hpricot for the job. After all, it's not as if the code starts to rust :) Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
