On 10/02/2012, at 2:23 PM, Steven Ringo wrote: > Michael: I definitely felt that a ruby-based async solution would be > reinventing what most mailservers actually do internally, and will end up > consuming a lot more resource.
This is what I currently use https://gist.github.com/1786236 (discussed in the other thread here). It doesn't consume any resources and keeps UI responsive. But of course it is more likely that you'll use some email if something goes wrong. I'm ok with that though. And yeah, I second the postmark is pretty good. The REST api works really well, but it looks like SMTP too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
