I like the sound of what it does, and think it adds some nice improvements to sytax. I'd probably consider using it for some of the more complex joins I'm doing. But the fact that it breaks default functionality (and the developers response) scares me.
You might be able to mitigate that breakage in your own code, but it'd be a world of hurt if you ever use a Gem (either directly or indirectly) that relies on it. Craig On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Dmytrii Nagirniak <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I wonder if anybody is using Squeel (https://github.com/ernie/squeel) in > production? > > I tried it once and there were some minor issues that changed how the AR > actually works (for example this: > https://github.com/ernie/squeel/issues/75). > > Probably top things I like about squeel: > - sifters - much easier to reuse the "scopes" among different models; > - Ruby-like queries, Hash conditions and even Arel sometimes look too > complicated; > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers, > Dmytrii > http://ApproachE.com > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. > -- Craig Read @Catharz https://github.com/Catharz http://stackoverflow.com/users/158893/catharz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
