Peter Michaux wrote: > On 7/19/06, Todd Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Peter Michaux wrote: >> > On 7/19/06, Todd Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> but I still believe in Prototype-the-project. >> > >> > I'm curious why. >> >> I've already eluded to the why. Its the cleanest, most elegant >> JavaScript code base that I've ever laid eyes on. > > It may be the cleanest and most elegant that you've seen but it is not > clean or elegant. For example, look at the insertion code
You responded to one of my messages twice. Once on 07/19 and again on 07/22. Are you just sitting there stewing over the fact that people disagree with you? Go start a blog or something then. In any case, I consider it poor etiquette. I think Prototype is clean. Although, perhaps you'd be more comfortable with the word "consistent." I think Prototype is elegant. I *like* a lot of the little tricks that it employs. When I first understood bind(), I thought it was brilliant. All of your criticisms seem to be leveled at its *efficiency*, which I never said it was. I, personally, would rather see you opening bugs and submitting patches to eliminate the inefficiencies that seem to make you so uncomfortable. Todd Ross _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
