The insertion stuff totally makes sense when you think that Proto & Scripty were build as the visible client layer to Ruby on Rails.
I've always assumed that their approach to AJAX was to return HTML fragments and insert them into the DOM. If you look at it that way all the insertion and script handling within innerHTML all makes perfect sense. On 23/07/06, Peter Michaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/22/06, Todd Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You responded to one of my messages twice. Once on 07/19 and again on > 07/22. I had another idea > Are you just sitting there stewing over the fact that people > disagree with you? No. It is not about disagreeing at all. > I think Prototype is elegant. Even the Insertion stuff? > All of your criticisms seem to be > leveled at its *efficiency* Not at all. I've listed many others too. Peter _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
-- Andrew Tetlaw htp://tetlaw.id.au _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
