Bob Triphahn wrote:

> Duane,
>
> Your solution on the age of Rangers stepping up or in this case down an
> age-group is????

*Right... I beleve anyone who throws a mud pie should be part of
the solution.. more than the criticizum. *So to me it is NOT a problem
to have 5 equal point earners be part of this years "Dist.Ranger's of the Year-

PIONEER HONOR PATROL
TRAILBLAZER HONOR PATROL

*This way it takes away the desire to "Lord" or "Glory" in the singular
win, awards something of value to the achiever and set's up a "goal"
for the rest of the boy's to earn ta "special  level of membership"

Ect. and get a "free" pass to Ranger camp fee's!.<G>

>
>
> Sorry partner even in Christian circles when rules are set up for fair play
> someone will try to find a loop-hole <that's mankind in a nutshell>.

*People allways tell me that before they *THINK about things just
a little harder... We often come from "sports-little league mentality or
from para-military thinking" as our pool of resource, but "Fair Play"
also means running everyone through the "chow line" or being respectfull
of each Rangers efforts.   With just a little thought, useing the mediphores
we have in place with the Code,Pledge,Motto and Patrol orginization..

We can expand "Da Groove" and *Raise the MORALE to begin a
re-newed period of effective leadership! Hooray fer "Fair Play" but
remember to turn the "table of orgainazation in RR upside down, for
the boys, before Leaders!"



>
>
> As for the election please give your sources on the charges of shenanigans
> for both sides.

*That's over man... later the facts will come out.

I just wanted to note that BUSH has a tightrope to walk...
and the worst thing he could do is embrace conservitive retoric,
the far right or say something against liberal causes.

Many Rangerneters want him to preach the Bible or something,
but his job *Like he said... is to be the President of ALL the people.

*It's his watch- and I think we can agree that we don't need a
"wordsmith-primadona or a stiff suit" we need a *Leader!

Again, like I said:  "High MORALE is the index of effective leadership"

Bush's job is to use his office to build bridges, and include people in
the positive governing of this great country. GORE gave a hearty
speech that was straight out "mighty-fine".  Read again, what he said..

And my guy: Sen John Mc Cain told the truth as well!<G>

"Campaign finance reform is needed because *soft money is stealing
our elected leaders from the jobs they are sent to do..."

>
>
> Thanks and be blessed even in the midst of turmoil,

*Rodger-that<G>
-=A=-

>
>
> Bob Triphahn
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duane Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 1:51 PM
> Subject: [RR] Why ROY (Ranger of Year) and the electoral college need to
> disappear!
>
> >
> > *I've headed  three years of 4 age groups of sectional Ranger of the
> > year
> > achievers to NW Dist. Ranger of the Year "compitition" and want to blow
> > the wistle on a less than perfect system.
> >
> > The "rule" that allows a boy to compete for the previous year's
> > achievement
> > allows for a member of a older group like Trail blazer to put on a
> > Pioneer
> > uniform and compete against real Pioneers who are the right age.
> >
> > A Commander can "load" the bases by playing the birthdays of his
> > Rangers and chooseing in what group the boy would have the best chance
> > of
> > succeeding to rise to the next level.
> >
> > Next, at the district level, the questions sometimes come from materials
> > outside
> > the of reasonable resource materials, and are slanted not to enhance the
> > experiance
> > of a common Royal Ranger... but to dis-qualify or come up with a winner.
> >
> > At the Dist. level there is to be no protest of the questions as well as
> > no copies
> > of the questions given out! The scoreing sheets and results are property
> > of
> > the dist. testors and distroyed before the awards cerimony to discourage
> >
> > protest of the contest!<G>  *Bravo fair play!
> >
> > *If the "meaning of the emblem" equates a balance of the Red-Gold and
> > Blue
> > points, then the questions should fall into that balance of
> > understanding common
> > to all Ranger's at each age level, and not slant heavy to a Bible expert
> > over
> > a Sports centered ranger. The title "Ranger of the Year" may not allways
> >
> > apply to the winners in truth, but may be just an act of administrative
> > justice.
> >
> >
> > *Like the "Electoral College" in the latest presidential election
> > shows...
> >
> > The "Popular vote" can be over come by a close reading of the "rules"
> > and adhearence to monkey wrenching with the time line, and influenceing
> > people after the vote.
> >
> > Throw both out!
> > ----------------
> > *Thanks-
> > -=A=-
> >
> > _______
> >  To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm
> >  http://rangernet.org    Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _______
>  To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm
>  http://rangernet.org    Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
��ࡱ�


_______
 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe rangernet" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 or visit http://rangernet.org/subscribe.htm
 http://rangernet.org    Autoresponder: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to