Pak Syaf

Jikok ambo yang di mandatkan untuak maundang, tolong kirimkan bara urang nan
ka hadir dan tanggal bara perkiraannyo. Bia ambo siapkan.

Salam

andiko

Pada 6 Januari 2011 10.43, Dr Saafroedin Bahar <
[email protected]> menulis:

> Batua Riri, bung Andi Ko memang merencanakan mengundang urang Oxfam utk
> manjalehkan hasil riset tu. Ambo harokkan Riri bisa hadir mengkritisi. Jadi
> kito adokan tigo tahap: kito jo Oxfam; ditambah jo agt DPR dan DPD kaduonyo
> di Jkt; dilanjuikkan di Padang. Nan di Jkt bisa dipalaweh jo komunitas
> RantauNet dan Gebu Minang. Nan di Padang jo para stakeholders. Baa pandapek
> Riri?
>
> Saafroedin Bahar. Taqdir di tangan Allah swt, nasib di tangan kita.
> ------------------------------
> *From: * "Riri Mairizal Chaidir" <[email protected]>
> *Sender: * [email protected]
> *Date: *Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:30:04 +0700
> *To: *<[email protected]>
> *ReplyTo: * [email protected]
> *Subject: *RE: [...@ntau-net] TEMUAN OXFAM TENTANG KONDISI KESIAPAN MITIGASI
> KEBENCANAAN DI SUMBAR
>
>  Pak Saaf dan Dunsanak Sadonyo.
>
>
>
> Maaf, kalau manuruik ambo, kalau memang akan diadakan suatu diskusi
> mendalam dengan berbagai pihak, ada baiknya kita baca dulu pelan2 Laporan
> Hasil Risetnya secara utuh, tidak cuma Summary dan Recommendationnya.
>
>
>
> Kalau yang saya pahami – dari Report itu – mereka melakukan studi atas
> kebijakan Pemerintah. Kesimpulan mereka, Public Awareness itu sudah merupaka
> prioritas. Hanya saja, dalam hal warning system nya lebih banyak ke masalah
> teknologi dibandingkan sosio ekonomi.
>
>
>
> Tapi bisa saja saya pemahaman saya salah.
>
>
>
> Kalau saya (lagi2 kalau), dibandingkan terburu2 berdiskusi, apalagi dalam
> format besar (dengan mengundang Anggota DPR, DPD), langkah pertama adalah,
> bertemu dengan Researcher nya, minta beliau menjelaskan penelitiannya.
>
>
>
> Nah, dari situ – seandainya kita akan merefer ke Penelititan itu – baru
> kita pertimbangkan apakah mau mengadakan diskusi dalam lingkup yang lebih
> luas, atau cukup dengan “mengingatkan” Pemerintah bahwa ada hasil penelitian
> begini lho …
>
>
>
> Maaf, itu Cuma pendapat saya
>
>
>
>
>
> Riri
>
> 48/L/BEkasi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Dr. Saafroedin BAHAR
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:46 PM
> *To:* rantaunet rantaunet rantaunet
> *Cc:* Asril H. Tanjung; Muhammad Jamil; Mochtar Naim; Farhan Muin DATUK
> BAGINDO; Djohermansyah Djohan; Prof. Dr Azyumardi AZRA; Irman GUSMAN;
> Dutamardin Umar; Khairul Jasmi; andi ko
> *Subject:* [...@ntau-net] TEMUAN OXFAM TENTANG KONDISI KESIAPAN MITIGASI
> KEBENCANAAN DI SUMBAR
>
>
>
> Assalamualaikum w.w. para sanak sapalanta,
>
> Di bawah ini saya kutipkan hasil riset Oxfam -- yang di-upload oleh bung
> Andi Ko -- tentang tingkat kesiagaan dua daerah dalam mitigasi bencana,
> yaitu Jawa Barat dan Sumatera Barat. Intinya sama, bahwa kedua daerah ini
> sesungguhnya tidak siap, dan bahwa pelibatan masyarakat belum intensif.
>
>
>
> Sudah barang tentu hasil riset tersebut bukan sekedar untuk dibaca, tetapi
> untuk ditindaklanjuti. Dalam SKM GM yang lalu masalah kebencanaan ini juga
> termasuk mata acara,yang setelah dibahas, ya kesimpulannya sama.
>
>
>
> Saya telah mendorong bung Andi Ko untuk menindaklajutinya, antara lain
> dengan membahasnya secara lebih mendalam. Bung Andi Ko menyarankan agar
> pembahasan diadakan di Padang. Saya setuju.
>
>
>
> Sebelum di Padang, saya berpendapat agar diadakan dahulu di Jakarta,
> khususnya oleh karena yang dibutuhkan adalah investasi untuk infrastruktur
> mitigasi, yang tentu saja perlu dikaitkan dengan APBN.
>
>
>
> Saya menginginkan agar kita mengundang 19 orang anggota DPR RI dan empat
> anggota DPD yang berasal dari Sumatera Barat untuk dimintakan komitmennya.
> [Beliau-beliau kan pemegang amanah masyarakat Sumatera Barat].
>
>
>
> Siapa yang akan mengundang ? Kalau tidak ada yang siap, saya akan
> mengunsulkan agar Gebu Minang mengambil prakarsa.
>
>
>
> Bagaimana pendapat para sanak sapalanta ?
>
>
>
>
> Wassalam,
> Saafroedin Bahar Soetan Madjolelo
>
> (Laki-laki, Tanjung, masuk 74 th, Jakarta)
>
> Taqdir di tangan Allah, nasib di tangan kita.
>
>
>
> *The study’s findings and conclusions are as follows:*
>
>
>
>    - The priority of DRR investments in West Java and West Sumatra is
>    mostly in public awareness, disaster education and training. The main 
> actors
>    who invest in DRR are government and NGOs (INGO and local NGO).
>
>
>
>    - Gender mainstreaming is still found to be rare in both provinces
>    although NGOs are found to be more sensitive to gender. Therefore
>    cooperation between government and NGOs may make more gender sensitive
>    programs.
>
>
>
>    - The Ministry of Women Empowerment (MOWE) does not have capacity to
>    mainstream gender in government programs. This is because the MOWE 
> authority
>    is limited. Similarly, the agency of women empowerment’s power is also
>    limited to districts and large cities. As a result risk reduction measures
>    are less effective for women as risk assessments are not gender sensitive.
>
>
>
>    - *The number of victims in West Sumatera was still substantial,
>    largely due to the collapsing of buildings This shows that structural
>    mitigation is still not of high importance to the government*
>
>
>
>    - Most investment tends to focus on specific types of hazards, with
>    earthquakes and tsunamis having the highest investment. This shows an
>    imbalance in investment between earthquakes and tsunamis and other types of
>    hazards.
>
>
>
>    - *Disaster education while conducted at some formal education
>    institutions (public schools) is still limited. Disaster education, 
> however,
>    is not being taught at informal education institutions, such as courses.
>    *
>
>
>
>    - EWS tend to emphasize the technological components of the warning
>    systems and are not people centred. Applied research on DRR is still
>    limited. *Most of the research is found on physical modelling of
>    hazards with only limited on socio-economic issues.*
>
>
>
>    - The involvement of the private sector is very limited.
>
>
>
>    - NGOs traditionally work in rural areas but not in urban areas.
>
>
>
>    - *Government policies on disaster management are not based on strong
>    risk assessment.*
>
>
>
>    - Participatory projects have been seen to be effective as a result of
>    the increased awareness of the communities. *However, the participation
>    of the communities is still limited. Therefore, more investment must be 
> done
>    to ensure community active role in disaster risk reduction activities.*
>
>
>
> *Several recommendations were suggested:*
>
>
>
>    - *The scale of investment must consider the size of population and
>    area vulnerable to disaster. The current scale of investment is not yet
>    meeting the needs and must be expanded.*
>
>
>
>    - *Investment should also cover sectors that traditionally not
>    addressed by NGOs, such as structural mitigation that requires skills and
>    bigger resources and stronger regulation. This can be addressed by 
> improving
>    the enabling environment, including laws and building codes and involving
>    more actors that have the competence , e.g. private sectors.*
>
>
>
>    - Ministry of Women Empowerment and Children Protection should be
>    supported to enable them to advocate for the mainstreaming of gender into
>    DRR and emergency response. At the same time, NGOs, especially gender
>    focused NGOs, should also work more closely and advocate the newly
>    established BPBDs to mainstream gender into their organizations and
>    programmes.
>
>
>
>    - *Good lessons from participatory DRR projects should be scaled up to
>    other vulnerable communities.*
>
>
>
>    - *To speed up the disaster management institutions and legislation to
>    vulnerable districts, awareness and education should target decision makers
>    (legislative and executive). The established BPBDs should strengthen their
>    coordination function and leadership.*
>
>
>
>    - Education should not only cover formal education but also informal
>    education. This is not only on knowledge but also on the structural
>    mitigation and safety. Disaster education should also include knowledge of
>    secondary hazards (e.g. landslides and fires can be induced by 
> earthquakes).
>
>
>
>    - *Risk analysis should be used as a foundation for any disaster risk
>    reduction investments. The results from individual project risk analysis 
> (by
>    community based approach) should be used to fit with the government risk
>    analysis. On the other level, BPBDs should develop participatory risk
>    analysis mechanisms to enable more systematic and comprehensive risk
>    reduction systems. To ensure synchronization of various risk analysis
>    methodology, BPBD should conduct dialogue (such as DRR Forum) on risk
>    analysis and gender sensitive indicators.*
>
>
>
>    - *Existing EWS should strengthen their community components and cover
>    the other prominent hazards (floods and landslides).*
>
>
>
>    - More social research into disaster risk reductions. Funding for
>    social research in disaster risk reduction should be increased
>
>
>
>    - *All investments will require additional financial and other
>    resources. Government and donors should increase their financial support 
> but
>    also it is important to identify alternative sources of funds, for example:
>    the potential use of climate change adaptation funds.*
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> --
> .
> * Posting yg berasal dari Palanta RantauNet, dipublikasikan di tempat lain
> wajib mencantumkan sumber: ~dari Palanta r...@ntaunet
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/~<http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/%7E>
> * Isi email, menjadi tanggung jawab pengirim email.
> ===========================================================
> UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, melanggar akan dimoderasi:
> - DILARANG:
> 1. E-mail besar dari 200KB;
> 2. E-mail attachment, tawarkan di sini & kirim melalui jalur pribadi;
> 3. One Liner.
> - Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan serta mengirim biodata! Lihat di:
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/web/peraturan-rantaunet
> - Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi disetiap posting
> - Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dlm melakukan reply
> - Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tdk mereply email lama &
> mengganti subjeknya.
> ===========================================================
> Berhenti, bergabung kembali, mengubah konfigurasi/setting keanggotaan di:
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/subscribe.
>
> --
> .
> * Posting yg berasal dari Palanta RantauNet, dipublikasikan di tempat lain
> wajib mencantumkan sumber: ~dari Palanta r...@ntaunet
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/~<http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/%7E>
> * Isi email, menjadi tanggung jawab pengirim email.
> ===========================================================
> UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, melanggar akan dimoderasi:
> - DILARANG:
> 1. E-mail besar dari 200KB;
> 2. E-mail attachment, tawarkan di sini & kirim melalui jalur pribadi;
> 3. One Liner.
> - Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan serta mengirim biodata! Lihat di:
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/web/peraturan-rantaunet
> - Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi disetiap posting
> - Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dlm melakukan reply
> - Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tdk mereply email lama &
> mengganti subjeknya.
> ===========================================================
> Berhenti, bergabung kembali, mengubah konfigurasi/setting keanggotaan di:
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/subscribe.
>
> --
> .
> * Posting yg berasal dari Palanta RantauNet, dipublikasikan di tempat lain
> wajib mencantumkan sumber: ~dari Palanta r...@ntaunet
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/~<http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/%7E>
> * Isi email, menjadi tanggung jawab pengirim email.
> ===========================================================
> UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, melanggar akan dimoderasi:
> - DILARANG:
> 1. E-mail besar dari 200KB;
> 2. E-mail attachment, tawarkan di sini & kirim melalui jalur pribadi;
> 3. One Liner.
> - Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan serta mengirim biodata! Lihat di:
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/web/peraturan-rantaunet
> - Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi disetiap posting
> - Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dlm melakukan reply
> - Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tdk mereply email lama &
> mengganti subjeknya.
> ===========================================================
> Berhenti, bergabung kembali, mengubah konfigurasi/setting keanggotaan di:
> http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/subscribe.
>

-- 
.
* Posting yg berasal dari Palanta RantauNet, dipublikasikan di tempat lain 
wajib mencantumkan sumber: ~dari Palanta r...@ntaunet 
http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/~
* Isi email, menjadi tanggung jawab pengirim email.
===========================================================
UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, melanggar akan dimoderasi:
- DILARANG:
  1. E-mail besar dari 200KB;
  2. E-mail attachment, tawarkan di sini & kirim melalui jalur pribadi; 
  3. One Liner.
- Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan serta mengirim biodata! Lihat di: 
http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/web/peraturan-rantaunet
- Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi disetiap posting
- Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dlm melakukan reply
- Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tdk mereply email lama & mengganti 
subjeknya.
===========================================================
Berhenti, bergabung kembali, mengubah konfigurasi/setting keanggotaan di: 
http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/subscribe.

Kirim email ke