On 2009-02-11, Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> we've had a contribution of some license fixing code but really RAT has > lost momentum... I'm not sure it ever had that much once it created the first useful reports. RAT now more or less does what needs to be done and most remaining stuff is cosmetics IMHO, it really is more of an infrastructure component (reminds me of the state of Gump, in a way). Sure it could be nice to extract some code here or there or refactor a few things but RAT is not the primary project anybody of us is working on - and there is no urgency to change anything. Stefan
