I remembered a couple of days ago and was planning on submitting one today too. Do you think splitting them is best? I was h
-----Original Message----- From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 05:30 AM Eastern Standard Time To: [email protected] Subject: ApacheCON NA 2011 CFP: deadline today! Hi all, I almost missed it but suddenly realized I haven't seen any feedback anymore about presenting Rave at the ApacheCON NA 2011 (Vancouver) later this year. As the CFP deadline end *today* (midnight Pacific Time), I want to check if anyone did send in a proposal. I remember Matt chiming in before indicating he was willing to come up with something? Assuming nobody has send in anything yet, I think we maybe could propose two separate talks: a) Rave Overview and Role (high-level/non-technical): history community goals future b) Rave Technical: background (e.g. originating projects, current usages/examples) architecture features (small demos) goals (functional and technical) roadmap final grant demo Assuming Matt or others might be interested and might have a preference for the technical talk, I'm inclined to pitch for the first one and write up a proposal for that today. But if someone else has a preference to pick that one up just let me know. I only want to make sure we're covering both (type of) talks, so if nobody else can or want to jump in, I'm even willing to send in proposals for both. Please chime in ASAP *today* if/when you are willing to participate in this, or already did :) Regards, Ate
