That¹s what I get for typing an e-mail at a stop light :) What I was trying to say was that I think the highest value presentation is the general discussion of what Rave is, where it came from, what our goals are, etc. What I was thinking is we would have one larger talk that is more project and community focused and a technical training where we walk people through how they can apply and develop for Rave in their own organizations. In this setting we can explore the technologies and options for building widgets.
I am willing to submit whatever proposals need submitting, but I definitely want to participate in the overview talk; maybe as a second (or third) speaker to Ate? On 4/29/11 8:06 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." <[email protected]> wrote: >I remembered a couple of days ago and was planning on submitting one >today too. Do you think splitting them is best? I was h > > > > -----Original Message----- >From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 05:30 AM Eastern Standard Time >To: [email protected] >Subject: ApacheCON NA 2011 CFP: deadline today! > >Hi all, > >I almost missed it but suddenly realized I haven't seen any feedback >anymore >about presenting Rave at the ApacheCON NA 2011 (Vancouver) later this >year. > >As the CFP deadline end *today* (midnight Pacific Time), I want to check >if >anyone did send in a proposal. >I remember Matt chiming in before indicating he was willing to come up >with >something? > >Assuming nobody has send in anything yet, I think we maybe could propose >two >separate talks: > >a) Rave Overview and Role (high-level/non-technical): > history > community > goals > future > >b) Rave Technical: > background (e.g. originating projects, current usages/examples) > architecture > features (small demos) > goals (functional and technical) > roadmap > final grant demo > >Assuming Matt or others might be interested and might have a preference >for the >technical talk, I'm inclined to pitch for the first one and write up a >proposal >for that today. But if someone else has a preference to pick that one up >just >let me know. > >I only want to make sure we're covering both (type of) talks, so if >nobody else >can or want to jump in, I'm even willing to send in proposals for both. > >Please chime in ASAP *today* if/when you are willing to participate in >this, or >already did :) > >Regards, > >Ate
