-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I can skype.
On 4/29/11 9:12 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 04/29/2011 02:23 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >> That¹s what I get for typing an e-mail at a stop light :) >> >> What I was trying to say was that I think the highest value presentation >> is the general discussion of what Rave is, where it came from, what our >> goals are, etc. What I was thinking is we would have one larger talk >> that >> is more project and community focused > +1, that fits with what I had in mind for the first talk. > >> and a technical training where we >> walk people through how they can apply and develop for Rave in their own >> organizations. In this setting we can explore the technologies and >> options for building widgets. > I'm not completely sure what you mean with training, but training > sessions on the ApacheCon are different than "normal" presentations. > Usually two days before or after the formal 3 day conference are > reserved for these training sessions, which each may range from 0.5, 1 > or 2 days. > More importantly though: a participant has to pay separately to join a > training *and* for a training to be accepted and executed at least a > minimum number of (paying) participants is required. In the past this > usually was 9+. > > So, while a training session definitely might be cool, even if accepted > there is no guarantee upfront you actually get to do it... > > Anyway, I'm absolutely fine if you want to propose such a training > session, but I'd still like to see a technical oriented *talk* as well > to address and reach the full potential of the ApacheCON visitors not > just those willing to pay extra for a training. > >> >> I am willing to submit whatever proposals need submitting, but I >> definitely want to participate in the overview talk; maybe as a second >> (or >> third) speaker to Ate? > > I'd definitely like a joined presentation. I've done so several times in > the past (also ApacheCON) it it really works well if each (or more) can > focus on different aspects. Also more entertaining for the audience, if > done well :) > > Lets try to work this out today, I'll be available on skype shortly (+/- > 30 min. from now), anyone else willing to join please just ping me/us. > > Ate > >> >> On 4/29/11 8:06 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B."<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I remembered a couple of days ago and was planning on submitting one >>> today too. Do you think splitting them is best? I was h >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 05:30 AM Eastern Standard Time >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: ApacheCON NA 2011 CFP: deadline today! >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I almost missed it but suddenly realized I haven't seen any feedback >>> anymore >>> about presenting Rave at the ApacheCON NA 2011 (Vancouver) later this >>> year. >>> >>> As the CFP deadline end *today* (midnight Pacific Time), I want to check >>> if >>> anyone did send in a proposal. >>> I remember Matt chiming in before indicating he was willing to come up >>> with >>> something? >>> >>> Assuming nobody has send in anything yet, I think we maybe could propose >>> two >>> separate talks: >>> >>> a) Rave Overview and Role (high-level/non-technical): >>> history >>> community >>> goals >>> future >>> >>> b) Rave Technical: >>> background (e.g. originating projects, current usages/examples) >>> architecture >>> features (small demos) >>> goals (functional and technical) >>> roadmap >>> final grant demo >>> >>> Assuming Matt or others might be interested and might have a preference >>> for the >>> technical talk, I'm inclined to pitch for the first one and write up a >>> proposal >>> for that today. But if someone else has a preference to pick that one up >>> just >>> let me know. >>> >>> I only want to make sure we're covering both (type of) talks, so if >>> nobody else >>> can or want to jump in, I'm even willing to send in proposals for both. >>> >>> Please chime in ASAP *today* if/when you are willing to participate in >>> this, or >>> already did :) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Ate >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNurn3AAoJEOEgD2XReDo5RL4H/2SJkf9tevp1Ey4WdBiF0awx hA5bNcz1nuVM6j0fPYJKSpERDsTSH82X9T5zd0Q+S45n1dVyTK/1sAz7+c+01HVq 8RH1c0NSYod4NH7We2L3ET60bzkDCcXEW/bUVmiRQsijEx8EcvXHASVNj/L6LymU CXXcf9aijEiOtWiLVAmygL69FlgVrWdQI5f4WqQNQvb8/z+9WKVQdPdNACwVxj1K tt0x6r3rrtImrJ3oJ+Q1sIxivO81ZvV+IrOfsihadIsgf7G2HMD/hdQ1KKj+LDDw mHEpAJKB4fYTnj057Vu+o3N8b26CLbfHI0LeTZ1nbz6nCxuwGcnEDE9JIBi+R84= =mZH1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
