>-----Original Message----- >From: Mahadevan, Venkat [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 10:40 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > >I had the same issue, clearing the /tmp/rave DB files fixed it.
Good to hear. I don't think it is a blocker, but we should at least note it on the download page.... > > >Venkat > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ate Douma [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 8:18 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > >I still haven't had the time to review the candidate in detail, I expect to >provide more feedback earliest late today / this evening. > >However, I did try to run the binary download and hit a problem right away: >login doesn't seem to work anymore. >That might be something specific to my environment, but seems odd. >I will try to figure out what is causing the problem, but I did see some >exceptions thrown in the console during startup: > >11699 ravePersistenceUnit TRACE [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 1730147382, >conn >1904595916> executing stmnt 292713878 CREATE INDEX I_WDGTMNT_USER >ON >widget_comment (user_id) >11699 ravePersistenceUnit TRACE [main] openjpa.jdbc.SQL - <t 1730147382, >conn >1904595916> [0 ms] spent >ERROR: >org.apache.rave.persistence.jpa.PopulatedLocalContainerEntityManagerFact >ory - >Database population has failed. It will be empty. >java.lang.RuntimeException: SQL exception occurred loading data from >initial_data.sql > >and: > >UPDATE RAVE_PORTAL_SEQUENCES SET seq_count = (seq_count + 1) WHERE >seq_name = >@portal_preference_seq; [23505-154] > at >org.h2.message.DbException.getJdbcSQLException(DbException.java:327) > at org.h2.message.DbException.get(DbException.java:167) > at org.h2.message.DbException.get(DbException.java:144) > at >org.h2.index.BaseIndex.getDuplicateKeyException(BaseIndex.java:80) > >Anyway, it might be something trivial but right now I cannot yet give a vote. >Not sure when Matt wants to wrap up this vote but maybe it might be good to >wait >a few hours up to a day more. > >Regards, > >Ate > >On 12/01/2011 12:30 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >> Discussion thread for vote on 0.6-incubating release candidate. >> >> Note, there were two staging repos created during the release process. I >am unsure why this happened, but I did have a network hiccup while the >release script was running, so maybe that was the issue. All of the artifacts >appear to have made it fine, but it would be good to have a second pair of >eyes check that. >> >> Also, I forgot to create a combined release with the updated master pom >containing the metadata that has Sean as a committer/PPMC member listed. >> >> For more information on the release process, checkout - >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> >> Some of the things to check before voting are: >> - can you run the demo binaries >> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag >> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and >> DISCLAIMER files >> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable >> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server >
