Sorry, I thought this was the vote thread seems someone changed the subject rather than created a new thread. This works for some mail clients, not for others. Any way, I hunted down something with the right subject and voted there.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 28, 2011 5:24 PM, "Franklin, Matthew B." <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Ross! When you get the chance, would you mind replying with your > +1 to the VOTE thread? > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 11:37 AM > >To: Franklin, Matthew B. > >Cc: [email protected]; Sylvain Wallez ([email protected]); > >[email protected] > >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > > > >Thanks to the holiday period I found some time, so: > > > >+1 > > > >Ross > > > >On 27 December 2011 21:05, Franklin, Matthew B. <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >> We have sufficient PPMC votes to send this to the incubator, but not > >enough mentor votes to ensure it succeeds on that list. If no one > objects, I > >will send the vote to the general list tomorrow morning and hope for the > best. > >> > >> -Matt > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 11:34 PM > >>>To: [email protected] > >>>Cc: Sylvain Wallez ([email protected]); Ross Gardler > >>>([email protected]); [email protected] > >>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > >>> > >>>Anyone had time to validate this change? We also still need 2 more +1s > >from > >>>mentors... > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. > >>>>Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:38 PM > >>>>To: [email protected] > >>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>________________________________________ > >>>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [[email protected]] > >>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:36 PM > >>>>>To: [email protected] > >>>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > >>>>> > >>>>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 7:41 AM > >>>>>>To: [email protected] > >>>>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > >>>>>> > >>>>>><snip> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>I've now created a patch which, if needed, can be applied also to > the > >>>>>>>0.6-incubating release/tag sources as well as has been applied > already > >to > >>>>>>>trunk. > >>>>>>>See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-382 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Based on this fix and documented workaround for (only) the 0.6- > >>>>incubating > >>>>>>>binary > >>>>>>>demo (see RAVE-382), I'm going to vote +1 on this release candidate > >>>now, > >>>>>>>under > >>>>>>>the provision we'll provide an updated README (or add a > >>>>RELEASE_NOTES?) > >>>>>>>with the > >>>>>>>release, both in the binary distribution and on the website. > >>>>>>>This should also point users to RAVE-382 and its patch with > instructions > >>>>how > >>>>>>to > >>>>>>>manually fix the releases sources if needed > >>>>>> > >>>>>>I will repack the demo binaries with the updated RELEASE notes and > >>>>pointers > >>>>>>on the website later today > >>>>> > >>>>>Or tomorrow..... Sorry, I was overcome by events today. Since we are > >>>>waiting on our other mentors to vote on the >release, I have time :) > >>>> > >>>>Updated README in binary release and uploaded to build location. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Ate > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ate > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Or stated another way -- I don't see any reason why other > projects > >>>>that > >>>>>>>have > >>>>>>>>> been building on Rave should have to miss out on this release due > >to > >>>a > >>>>>>>>> configuration problem which probably wouldn't even affect them > >(or > >>>if > >>>>it > >>>>>>>did, > >>>>>>>>> with proper documentation of known issues for the release, could > >be > >>>>>>>easily > >>>>>>>> worked around). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Just to be clear: regardless my vote, if you get a majority and > +3 > >>>IPMC > >>>>>>>votes > >>>>>>>>>> this release can be regarded successfully. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Ate > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > >Programme Leader (Open Development) > >OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >
