Thanks again, Ross. From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 1:29 PM To: Franklin, Matthew B. Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate
Sorry, I thought this was the vote thread seems someone changed the subject rather than created a new thread. This works for some mail clients, not for others. Any way, I hunted down something with the right subject and voted there. Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 28, 2011 5:24 PM, "Franklin, Matthew B." <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks Ross! When you get the chance, would you mind replying with your +1 to the VOTE thread? >-----Original Message----- >From: Ross Gardler >[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] >Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 11:37 AM >To: Franklin, Matthew B. >Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; >Sylvain Wallez ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate > >Thanks to the holiday period I found some time, so: > >+1 > >Ross > >On 27 December 2011 21:05, Franklin, Matthew B. ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >wrote: >> We have sufficient PPMC votes to send this to the incubator, but not >enough mentor votes to ensure it succeeds on that list. If no one objects, I >will send the vote to the general list tomorrow morning and hope for the best. >> >> -Matt >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. >>>[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] >>>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 11:34 PM >>>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>Cc: Sylvain Wallez ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); Ross >>>Gardler >>>([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); >>>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate >>> >>>Anyone had time to validate this change? We also still need 2 more +1s >from >>>mentors... >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. >>>>Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:38 PM >>>>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate >>>> >>>> >>>>>________________________________________ >>>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. >>>>>[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] >>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:36 PM >>>>>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate >>>>> >>>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. >>>>>>[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] >>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 7:41 AM >>>>>>To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate >>>>>> >>>>>><snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>>I've now created a patch which, if needed, can be applied also to the >>>>>>>0.6-incubating release/tag sources as well as has been applied already >to >>>>>>>trunk. >>>>>>>See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-382 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Based on this fix and documented workaround for (only) the 0.6- >>>>incubating >>>>>>>binary >>>>>>>demo (see RAVE-382), I'm going to vote +1 on this release candidate >>>now, >>>>>>>under >>>>>>>the provision we'll provide an updated README (or add a >>>>RELEASE_NOTES?) >>>>>>>with the >>>>>>>release, both in the binary distribution and on the website. >>>>>>>This should also point users to RAVE-382 and its patch with instructions >>>>how >>>>>>to >>>>>>>manually fix the releases sources if needed >>>>>> >>>>>>I will repack the demo binaries with the updated RELEASE notes and >>>>pointers >>>>>>on the website later today >>>>> >>>>>Or tomorrow..... Sorry, I was overcome by events today. Since we are >>>>waiting on our other mentors to vote on the >release, I have time :) >>>> >>>>Updated README in binary release and uploaded to build location. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Ate >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or stated another way -- I don't see any reason why other projects >>>>that >>>>>>>have >>>>>>>>> been building on Rave should have to miss out on this release due >to >>>a >>>>>>>>> configuration problem which probably wouldn't even affect them >(or >>>if >>>>it >>>>>>>did, >>>>>>>>> with proper documentation of known issues for the release, could >be >>>>>>>easily >>>>>>>> worked around). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just to be clear: regardless my vote, if you get a majority and +3 >>>IPMC >>>>>>>votes >>>>>>>>>> this release can be regarded successfully. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ate >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >> > > > >-- >Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >Programme Leader (Open Development) >OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
