On 1/16/12 11:12 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 1/16/12 10:56 AM, "Ross Gardler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On 16 January 2012 15:52, Franklin, Matthew B. <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>... >> >>> As a first step, I took a look at the remaining work items on our >>>status >>> page that need to be completed and updated the dates for the ones we >>>have >>> finished, but had not recorded. That leaves us with the following list >>>of >>> items: >>> >>> * Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and >>> check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already >>> trademarked for an existing software product. >> >>Important > >I remember someone looking quickly when we picked the name, but I think >the proper process is to use the PODLINGNAMESEARCH project in JIRA now >that Robert has it setup. I will add a new ticket today to JIRA. Done. As far as I can tell, we are somewhat responsible for performing the suitable name searches and recording the objective results in the ticket. I will engage the general list for clarification. > >> >>> * If request from anywhere to become a stand-alone PMC, then assess the >>> fit with the ASF, and create the lists and modules under the incubator >>> address/module names if accepted. >> >>Important > >We are definitely shooting for top level IMO, but I am a little unclear >what this is looking for. If we just need to provide justification for >our fit as a Top Level, that is fine; but creating lists and modules seems >to me like an activity to be done after the board accepts the resolution. > > >> >>> * Ask infrastructure to set up wiki (Confluence, Moin). >> >>Does the project want one? Not needed so far and not needed for >>graduation. You can always ask for one as a TLP if you change your >>minds. > >I think we could use one for helping to engage the wider community,but >definitely not something we need to worry about IMO until after >graduation. I didn't fill it out as N/A because I don't know how others >feel. The only discussion I remember about the wiki is that we did not >want to put documentation on one. > >> >>> * Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been >>> updated to reflect the new ASF copyright. >> >>Already done, surely? > > >I am not sure about all three donations. We should probably double checkŠ > > >> >>Ross > >
