On 1/16/12 12:42 PM, "William Hayes" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Can the iCLA be signed as a clickthrough form in setting up an account on >the wiki? Or does it need to be manually signed? They must be recorded with the secretary and can be submitted only via e-mail, fax, post [1]. That being said, I think that having both official & "unofficial" (community) documentation might be OK. It gives the community a low barrier of entry whilst preserving the integrity of project documentation. Thoughts? [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/ > >On 1/16/12 12:30 PM, "Ross Gardler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On 16 January 2012 16:31, William Hayes <[email protected]> >>wrote: >>> +1 Regarding using Confluence Wiki for support documentation, knowledge >>> sharing. >>> >>> Setting up a wiki for documentation would help a lot >> >>Note that if you intend to open up the site for people who have not >>signed an iCLA then this is unnofficial documentation. It cannot be >>packaged as official documentation under the Apache licence in these >>circumstances. >> >>This may or may not be a problem for the project, just thought I'd >>make you aware. >> >>Ross >> > >
