On 31 January 2012 08:42, Niels van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ate, > > In the Jira ticket you show the result of a scan that tested for > potential isssues. Is it also possible to let such a scan actually list > the files it thinks are in error? that would already be a lot less work > that browse trough all source code.
See the attachment on the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12512376/rat-scan-initial-rave-donations.txt All these files are in rave-donations and thus not part of any release. My recommendation would be simply to move the whole rave-donations tree to apache-extras-org and mark it as an archive project. Ross > > Cheers, > Niels > > On 01/30/2012 01:40 AM, Ate Douma wrote: >> On 01/16/2012 07:08 PM, Ate Douma wrote: >>> On 01/16/2012 05:12 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>> On 1/16/12 10:56 AM, "Ross Gardler"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> * Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been >>>>>> updated to reflect the new ASF copyright. >>>>> >>>>> Already done, surely? >>>> >>>> >>>> I am not sure about all three donations. We should probably double >>>> checkŠ >>> >>> Yes, we need to make sure. I think I went through that in the >>> beginning, but its >>> too long ago already to recall if it was complete(d). >>> >>> I'll volunteer doing the due diligence on this one, although it might >>> take me a >>> few days before I find time to do so. >>> I will create a JIRA ticket for this. >>> >> Please see my follow up on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-425 >> >> I think we've got still quite some work on our place for this ... >> >> As I wrote in the issue, this is something we (the Mentors) clearly >> dropped the ball on and should have followed up long time ago already, >> for which I'd like to apologize for not doing so. >> >> I tried to provide a set of steps we can follow to resolve this, but >> for myself this also is something I haven't dealt with before, so I'd >> like the other mentors to chime in as well what they think should be >> the right way to proceed. >> >> If needed we can consult the other IPMC members to help us out too as >> there should be plenty of experience with these things. >> >> And I'm definitely willing to help out directly, with whatever is >> needed to speed this up, just let me know. >> >> Regards, Ate >> >> >> -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
