>-----Original Message----- >From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:09 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: 0.9-incubating release? > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:44 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: 0.9-incubating release? >> >>On 1 March 2012 14:28, Jasha Joachimsthal <[email protected]> >>wrote: >>> Time flies when you're having fun. Luckily February was 1 day longer than >>> usual, but today is March, 1st. >>> @Matt you're probably still at the OpenSocial summit. When do you plan >to >>> start the 0.9-incubating release? > >I am back > >> >>I'd like to suggest someone else step up to cut the release. There is >>no problem with Matt always doing it but anyone can do it and it is >>good to have more than one person able to do it. I'm sure Matt will >>guide them through the process - any volunteers? > >I am more than willing to cut releases and could do 0.9-incubating today; but, >I >agree that there should be at least one more committer familiar with the >process and setup to do the releases. This will remove what I consider to be a >bus factor; a single release manager.
If no one volunteers to do the release, I will cut it tomorrow. > >I am also very happy to help someone through the process. I have a new >version of the release documentation that I was waiting to push until I heard >back from INFRA on why the svnpubsub release isn't working. > >> >>In addition, since the graduation vote has passed this project will >>(probably) be a TLP on 22 March. Will the release be done before then? >>If not it could be 0.9 (no incubating) > >0.9 should be able to be done and out the door by the board meeting, so I >think it should be 0.9-incubating. > >> >>> I assume the next version will be 0.10-incubating. >> >>Regardless of when 0.9 is done the next release will almost certainly >>be 0.10 (no incubating) > >:) > >> >>Ross
