>-----Original Message----- >From: Jasha Joachimsthal [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 1:12 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: 0.9-incubating release? > >I'd like to help too, but don't have time this week. >How much time does it take you to create a release (just to get an idea)?
I have automated a bunch of the heavy lifting (but it is still a work in progress), so to spin the original release takes about 45-60 min of time with about 20-30 of those minutes building the e-mail, verifying the build, checking license & notice, etc. From there, it's about watching and managing the vote e-mails. > >Sent from my phone. Autocorrect happens. >Op 1 mrt. 2012 17:35 schreef "Franklin, Matthew B." <[email protected]> >het volgende: > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Raminderjeet Singh [mailto:[email protected]] >> >Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:31 AM >> >To: [email protected] >> >Subject: Re: 0.9-incubating release? >> > >> >I would love to help but this week is bit craze with few deadlines. Matt >> if you >> >have steps in some README please share. I will try to follow that and get >> >ready to do the next release. >> >> Great! You will (hopefully) get to cut the first official release as a >> TLP :) There are two sets of steps: one-time configuration & release steps. >> >> Both can be found at >> http://incubator.apache.org/rave/release-management.html >> >> > >> >Thanks >> >Raminder >> > >> >On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:09 AM >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >>> Subject: RE: 0.9-incubating release? >> >>> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:44 AM >> >>>> To: [email protected] >> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9-incubating release? >> >>>> >> >>>> On 1 March 2012 14:28, Jasha Joachimsthal >> ><[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> Time flies when you're having fun. Luckily February was 1 day longer >> >than >> >>>>> usual, but today is March, 1st. >> >>>>> @Matt you're probably still at the OpenSocial summit. When do you >> >plan >> >>> to >> >>>>> start the 0.9-incubating release? >> >>> >> >>> I am back >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I'd like to suggest someone else step up to cut the release. There is >> >>>> no problem with Matt always doing it but anyone can do it and it is >> >>>> good to have more than one person able to do it. I'm sure Matt will >> >>>> guide them through the process - any volunteers? >> >>> >> >>> I am more than willing to cut releases and could do 0.9-incubating >> today; >> >but, I >> >>> agree that there should be at least one more committer familiar with >> the >> >>> process and setup to do the releases. This will remove what I >> consider to >> >be a >> >>> bus factor; a single release manager. >> >> >> >> If no one volunteers to do the release, I will cut it tomorrow. >> >> >> >>> >> >>> I am also very happy to help someone through the process. I have a >new >> >>> version of the release documentation that I was waiting to push until I >> >heard >> >>> back from INFRA on why the svnpubsub release isn't working. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> In addition, since the graduation vote has passed this project will >> >>>> (probably) be a TLP on 22 March. Will the release be done before >then? >> >>>> If not it could be 0.9 (no incubating) >> >>> >> >>> 0.9 should be able to be done and out the door by the board meeting, >> so I >> >>> think it should be 0.9-incubating. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> I assume the next version will be 0.10-incubating. >> >>>> >> >>>> Regardless of when 0.9 is done the next release will almost certainly >> >>>> be 0.10 (no incubating) >> >>> >> >>> :) >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Ross >> >> >> >>
