I was merely addressing the complaint portion. I'm in no position to dole out a database or checking mechanism. <G>
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Bill Sobel wrote: > Mike, > > > > You do have to wait a little bit...the server that accpets spam reports > > and the server that answers queries are separate systems...it takes a > > little bit of time for the report server to update the information in the > > query server. > > I think what Gerald wants is a local list of recently reported spam which > would be automatically treated as spam if seen again regardless if the > backend winds up agreeing with him or not. If you presume you trust the > spam submitters on the system, the option would seem to make some sense. > > Cheers, > Bill > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > _______________________________________________ > Razor-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
