Part of the reason that Razor has such a low false-positive rate is because every spam submitted was reviewed by a human (or a spamtrap address) and submitted. By submitting anything that crosses your SA threshhold, you're diluting Razor's spam database to match SA's rules. IMHO, the two approaches complement each other nicely, and we don't benefit from one emulating the other.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Schamanek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Razor-users] report or check && report? > > > > Hi razors, > > I am using spamassassin at our site and it's configured to stop > checking against its rules if the threshold is already reached. So, I > get a lot of spam which was not checked against razor. Some of this > spam is probably unknown to razor and it should be reported. At the > moment, I have installed a script that looks at the spamassassin > headers and if there was no razor check done the message is reported. > > Do you think that this is OK or should I first check if the message is > already reported by razor as being spam and eventually not report the > message? > > -- > -- Andreas > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Razor-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
