I wrote:
>> I have installed a script that looks at the spamassassin >> headers and if there was no razor check done the message is reported. >> >> Do you think that this is OK or should I first check if the message is >> already reported by razor as being spam and eventually not report the >> message? On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > If you're using Razor2, just report it. On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Bort, Paul wrote: > Part of the reason that Razor has such a low false-positive rate is > because every spam submitted was reviewed by a human (or a spamtrap > address) and submitted. By submitting anything that crosses your SA > threshhold, you're diluting Razor's spam database to match SA's > rules. IMHO, the two approaches complement each other nicely, and we > don't benefit from one emulating the other. So, the bottom line is that I should report to Razor1 in no case, but I should report to Razor2? -- -- Andreas P.S. To Paul: I doubt that the messages coming from my address are any less reviewed than from anybody else who is reporting as many messages as I am. My scripts are installed on a production server for a whole department. I cannot afford to filter messages that are not actually spam. (Neither can I afford to check every single message against razor's and others' databases.) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
