Since Razor1 is being retired, there won't be much point in trying to report to Razor1, anyhow, pretty soon.
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > > I wrote: > > >> I have installed a script that looks at the spamassassin > >> headers and if there was no razor check done the message is reported. > >> > >> Do you think that this is OK or should I first check if the message is > >> already reported by razor as being spam and eventually not report the > >> message? > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > If you're using Razor2, just report it. > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Bort, Paul wrote: > > > Part of the reason that Razor has such a low false-positive rate is > > because every spam submitted was reviewed by a human (or a spamtrap > > address) and submitted. By submitting anything that crosses your SA > > threshhold, you're diluting Razor's spam database to match SA's > > rules. IMHO, the two approaches complement each other nicely, and we > > don't benefit from one emulating the other. > > So, the bottom line is that I should report to Razor1 in no case, > but I should report to Razor2? > > -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
