Brian Fahrlander wrote:
> :0HW
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> {
> :0
> /dev/null
> }
>
> Is this some fundamental change to procmail (which would effect how we
> deal with spam) or just a simple misunderstanding of procmail (in
> what's got to be the 'biggest' surprise since North Korea having
> nukes...)
This is really a procmail question.
procmail-3.22 has a bug regarding the "H" flag. Try this instead:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/dev/null
The H flag is redundant, since it's always the default.
The W flag is not required in this case.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
