On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:09:51 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this some fundamental change to procmail (which would effect how we
> > deal with spam) or just a simple misunderstanding of procmail (in
> > what's got to be the 'biggest' surprise since North Korea having
> > nukes...)
>
> This is really a procmail question.
>
> procmail-3.22 has a bug regarding the "H" flag. Try this instead:
>
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> /dev/null
>
> The H flag is redundant, since it's always the default.
> The W flag is not required in this case.
Well, the "H" was a shot in the dark; even though I knew it was the default, I was
hoping it might change things, but it didn't. Oh, well. And the "W" was there
because I understood it as "W"rite to a file as opposed to a mailbox.
Where would I find such information on these flags? I've done google searches
on'em and always come up empty. I see lots of examples, but no explanations of the
flags. :(
Thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Fahrländer Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, IN My Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com
ICQ 5119262
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Komm', Mädchen, alles ist jetzt vorbei. Schall' Dich an, auf eine lange,
süße Reise.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
