Thanks, Matt. If I am the only person who reports this spam and the subsequent reports with the same identity and the same checksums are ignored, then it is not surprising that my reports are ignored, indeed. Of course, I could create several identities, but there is no point doing so, since probably no other users of razor receive this spam.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: well, as best I can tell the "sig not found" doesn't necessarily mean the sig is not known to the server. In my experience the razor server never, ever, reports back any matches that have a cf below 0, so I suspect any "known" signatures with a negative cf aren't reported back to the client at all. (note that a cf of 0 is supposed to be "average" and CF's range from +100 to -100) If I bump up my min_cf to 10, the razor server still reports back starting at 0, but my client will then decide to not call anything between 0 and 9 spam. So it is possible that the razor server has the sig for the email you've reported, but is waiting till some other people report it as well to have enough CF to call it spam.. From the trimmed down debug output you gave, it does look like the same mail is going in to report as check. Someone more expert on how razor really works will likely have to make some better interpretations of this debug data, or at least have questions/observations. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE Thawte Apache Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
