Excellent, thanks all for the info. I have done a few more bulk reports, today I sent 106 emails, only 4 required the email, and was over in seconds.
So going on that, if more and more of my "Not marked as spam" emails dont require the email sending to the razor server, there is good chance its learning / going to learn these as spam? So excited (I dont get out much) that my spam reports are doing soemthing :) Thanks, PaulG. On 4/22/07, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Goodyear wrote: > > Thanks Matt, I think i'm getting it now :) > > > > I have just run the razor-report script I have that sends my "not > > marked as spam folder" and it finishes like so. > > > > Mail 65 and 74 both received this "err 230 - server wants mail" does > > that mean that the razor servers already has a signature for the other > > emails and doesn't need it sending again, so only the two unknown > > mails were sent? > > Yes, however that doesn't mean the other reports were useless. > > If razor determines it already has a copy of the affected message, AFAIK, it > will just accept your report into the stats for that signature. > > After all, why would razor want you to send the whole text for a spam that's > already known to the system, and it's already got a copy on-file? Since they > have a copy already, they could theoretically support changing the e4 > selection > range based on that. > > (Yes, there's other issues here, but let's not get into an e4 range change > debate. It's an area of cloudmark too opaque for me to reasonably speculate > on.) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
