-----Original Message----- From: 'Thomas Jarosch'; '' Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Spamassassin's Razor scores
> Hello together, > > I'm wondering if it would make sense to add additional rules > for 95% to 100% > spam confidence? Is anybody already using a setup like that? > Any drawbacks? > > Cheers, > Thomas Thomas, I used to have higher SA scores for 95-100% razor spam confidence. However, I found that I could not increase the score very much. Occasionally, I would get a false positive for a blank email, no text with a few HTML tags and just attachments. The Razor database regularly contains data that indicates that a blank email is 100% known spam. There was no way to prevent the false positive because the whitelist feature for hash values was removed. I also tried combining scores for messages with a small amount of text and positive razor hits, but that allows too much spam. Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
