Thomas Jarosch wrote: > On Wednesday, 30. January 2008 20:36:09 Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> My recollection was that w/ e8 the cf was either really low or really high, >> and we just took the 51_100 values from the older pre-e8 rules and made it >> all consistent. >> >> I don't recall e4 stats. > > Maybe Vipul the great can provide some statistics if there is such a thing > like 80% or 90% cf level and if it's worth expanding the SpamAssassin rules. > As Theo noted there is probably more diversity for e4 than for e8, if at all.
I'm currently seeing both e8 and e4 with 87% of their matches being cf=100, which matches what I started to see yesterday. My samples are still pretty small, but I can definitely see a trend. Based on the numbers I'm seeing below, it *might* be valuable to split SA up into three cf ranges ie: 0-50, 51-99, 100-100. I'm not sure if there's more FPs in that 51-99 range that may be detracting from 100's performance, but it seems sensible to me to let the 100 grouping stand by itself since it is such a large percentage of hits. I wrote a quick little "grep and wc -l" shell script that greps through my razor-agent.log to so I can monitor it really quick (note: ac is currently 21, hence the 0's at the low end.) e4 total hits: 981 e4 cf 100: 857 e4 cf 90-99: 12 e4 cf 80-89: 2 e4 cf 70-79: 10 e4 cf 60-69: 21 e4 cf 50-59: 16 e4 cf 40-49: 8 e4 cf 30-39: 30 e4 cf 20-29: 25 e4 cf 10-19: 0 e4 cf 0-9: 0 --------------------------- e8 total hits: 1532 e8 cf 100: 1334 e8 cf 90-99: 22 e8 cf 80-89: 16 e8 cf 70-79: 29 e8 cf 60-69: 23 e8 cf 50-59: 33 e8 cf 40-49: 38 e8 cf 30-39: 24 e8 cf 20-29: 13 e8 cf 10-19: 0 e8 cf 0-9: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
