On Wednesday, 30. January 2008 20:36:09 Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:11:53PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > > You can try it if you like. The existing rules are the result of some > > testing that was done several years ago. I think it was Theo that did > > it.. > > Yeah, I wrote the rules + code way back when... I've been trying to find > some stats for this stuff, but didn't come up with anything useful. > > My recollection was that w/ e8 the cf was either really low or really high, > and we just took the 51_100 values from the older pre-e8 rules and made it > all consistent. > > I don't recall e4 stats.
Maybe Vipul the great can provide some statistics if there is such a thing like 80% or 90% cf level and if it's worth expanding the SpamAssassin rules. As Theo noted there is probably more diversity for e4 than for e8, if at all. Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
