Once everyone learns that they are leasing the program for a monthly fee of $150 + it will hit the fan. (after paying thousands for the program)
I guess if they quit paying the monthly fee the program locks up? Marc ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: RBASE-L Mailing List Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:02 PM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: 3 cheers for RBase Just a note from the sidelines. The combo of .NET and SQL Server is a very tough platform to beat function wise. I have a lot of experience in many different large scale corporate business applications and platforms and it takes a level of knowledge and support far above R:BASE to implement a sophisticated .NET application. This of course translates into $$$ and what makes R:BASE so attractive beyond the competition. Having said that, those who want the web based capability of .NET and who can effectively manage the projects will get a great application. I've said this before on the list, since I've never played around with the product I don't know for sure, but the combo of R:BASE C/S and the codecharge front-end should be able to match and maybe beat a .NET deployment function for function. (The open market for .NET widgets are sort of nice though) (Waiting patiently excited for R:BASE eXtreme to see how "eXtR:eme" it really is.) Regards, Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Date: Monday, August 11, 2008 9:04 am Subject: [RBASE-L] - 3 cheers for RBase To: [email protected] (RBASE-L Mailing List) > Thanks Razzak > > I thought I would give everyone a small update on the .Net SQL Exp > program that is trying to replace my app... [snip]
