Hi Steve,

With 64 you have a column name limit of 128 characters while with 32 you
only have 18 - this causes problems when you are trying to work with other
many database formats.  The full list of differences are at
http://www.rbase.com/rbg90/compare.php 


Regards

Clive Williams


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve
> Breen
> Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 21:18
> To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Recommendation
> 
> 
> 
> From a developemnt stand point would you really need the full capacity
> of the memory?
> 
> 
> 
> Normally would you just work with a limited sampling of any data base
> you are woring with ?
> 
> 
> 
> From a clint or  Prodution stand point you might need the lager
> capicity?
> 
> 
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marco
> Groeneveld
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 7:12 AM
> To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Recommendation
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> If R:BASE is new for you I would always say go for 64. Unless your
> budget is based for 32 max.
> 
> 
> 
> With 64 you have all 32 features but you can also use more memory as
> there is in todays PCs / Networks.
> 
> 
> 
> Marco
> 
>       ----- Original Message -----
> 
>       From: Steve Breen <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>       To: RBASE-L Mailing List <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>       Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 12:56 PM
> 
>       Subject: [RBASE-L] - Recommendation
> 
> 
> 
>       From a Beginning  or low level to medium level experienced
> Developer stand point what would be recommended when it comes to 9.0
> extreme.
> 
>       32 or 64
> 
>       And why?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       Stephen Breen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature database 5117 (20100515) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
> 
> http://www.eset.com

 

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5117 (20100515) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
 


Reply via email to