You don't mention what version of DOS you're using.  You can start by
getting DOS 7.6 and then UNLOAD ALL under the DOS version you have, then
rename the database, then start DOS 7.6 and run the file you created.  Now
you have a 7.6-compatible database and you can convert at your own speed.

There may be a few things to tend to, so you'll need to test the conversion,
but as I recall our biggest issue was moving from * and ? wildcards to % and
_ so we could do right and proper ODBC.

Now, I haven't *seen* mention of DOS 9.x ... but that doesn't mean it
doesn't exist.

Emmitt Dove
Manager, Converting Applications Development
Evergreen Packaging, Inc.
[email protected]
(203) 214-5683 m
(203) 643-8022 o
(203) 643-8086 f
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis
McGrath
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 15:19
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: converting forms from DOS to 7.6

I may be wrong, but the need to use 2000 as an intermediary between DOS and
any of the current versions is limiting 2000 will not connect to databases
with the newer indexing scheme.

If there is a way to go directly from DOS and skip 2000 I would certainly
like to know.

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marco
Groeneveld
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:00 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: converting forms from DOS to 7.6

Hi.

May I ask why you stay with 7.6. Maybe it is an good idea to start with 
R:BASE 9.0 (32) or (64).

Marco

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dennis McGrath" <[email protected]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 8:56 PM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - converting forms from DOS to 7.6


We are finally taking the steps to convert our DOS applications over to 7.6

I have two questions, since I seem to have lost the docs I thought I had 
saved.

1. Where can I find the most complete document on the forms/reports 
conversion process?


2. Taking the 1st step of converting from DOS to 2000, the fields in a dos 
region are still on the form, but not on the tiered region that was created.
I tried dragging them there but that didn't work.

What is the least labor intensive way to fix this kind of thing?

Thanks
Dennis McGrath


Reply via email to