Well In my experiance! If there is only one button to be pushed let that bee the button to close the computer down. If you need more buttons then the user and or the developer needs to think more how to qualify more then one button
Gunnar Ekblad Kontema IT AB Hästholmsvägen 32 131 30 Nacka Sweden -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] För MDRD Skickat: den 15 juni 2011 20:43 Till: RBASE-L Mailing List Ämne: [RBASE-L] - Re: OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? All of our users are Windows What is funny this guy promotes his software as easy to use, push 1 button and everything is done for you, 1 or 2 clicks and you can get to any part of the program you want, it's a total solution to all your needs. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Marco Groeneveld" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:23 PM To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > which os is used mostly by your users (DOS, Windows, Mac, Unix, Linux, > Web, Cloud) now and in future ? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dennis McGrath" <[email protected]> > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:17 PM > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > > > LOL! Cloudy thinking! Any of us could have told them that! > > Dennis McGrath > Software Developer > QMI Security Solutions > 1661 Glenlake Ave > Itasca IL 60143 > 630-980-8461 > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Javier > Valencia > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:02 PM > To: RBASE-L Mailing List > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > > .NET was the "future" of programming a few years ago; however, the nature > of > programming is constantly evolving. Applications used to be developed for > LAN/WAN use, now they need to be Web, Cloud, tablet and smart phone > friendly. Today's golden boy programming environment might end up as > tomorrow's red headed step child. > > The Cloud environment has been particularly over-hyped lately; however, I > am > starting to read in tech. publications, that many early Cloud adoptees are > stepping back as the shortcoming of the environment, particularly > security, > are becoming more evident. > > Javier, > > Javier Valencia, PE > 913-829-0888 Office > 913-915-3137 Cell > 913-649-2904 Fax > [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MDRD > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:42 AM > To: RBASE-L Mailing List > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > > LOL they were bragging about using cutting edge technology and programming > language > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Mike Byerley" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:04 AM > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> > Subject: [RBASE-L] - OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > >> >> And if you read industry info lately, .NET may be in it's twilight years >> already. >> >> This nightmarishly bloated library would never work in the tablet / phone >> environment and lately, MS has said they are going to spend a couple >> billion >> dollars to spiff up their C++ development environment (WinC is its' >> moniker) >> to attract developers back to that language. They have already stopped >> further meaningful development on VB.NET in favor of C#. >> >> MS is a little schizoid at the moment. Look for some changes at the top >> of >> the company in the coming months. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "MDRD" <[email protected]> >> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:43 AM >> Subject: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? >> >> >> >> Many of you may remember that my x distributor was trying to write my app >> in >> SQL Exp and Dot Net Framework. They started in Mar 2007 and below are >> some >> comments for our customers that have tried the other "improved" program. >> >> As you can see by my other thread, if I can "fix" my other issue (that >> only >> involves a small % of our users) I have a great opportunity to leave the >> Dot >> Net program in the dust. >> >> The x distributor says he spent 2 million building this dream program... >> LOL >> .. I could have sold him my code for 1.5 mill >> Also, he asked for my source code to so he could have another programmer >> update the look and feel in Jan 2007, then a month later he starts pre >> selling he new program... what a cheese ball. >> >> Marc >> >> >> I don't want to sit here and rip on it too much, BUT... Reports and >> financials do not even print the date they are for on them; only the date >> you printed. We got the software in Sept started running in Nov. We were >> promised errors and things would be fixed by Christmas with updates, >> didn't >> happen that way. The update didn't come until the new year. With the last >> update they changed how the accounting worked and now it runs as side by >> side program, which works ok for me cause I keep two computer screens >> running side by side. Even so though, if I add a new patient in the >> non-accounting side, I have to completely close the accounting software >> before the patient will be added to accounting side. They have major >> issues >> with being able to make corrections to claims, if say an accident >> occurred >> while billing, I have to resort to the last software and submit the >> corrected claim that way. Which is really sad, I think. The software is >> extremely slow, and there are so many screens you have to go through to >> make >> one simple change for your patient. It just doesn't seem to be thought >> out >> very well, much less user friendly. I should prob stop now. >> >> >> ------------------ >> The software that we were using prior to couldn't submit most claims >> electronically and hadn't had an update in years and was essentially >> crashing more and more everyday. ----------------------------- >> >> When ir was installed they did something to our other software, I had >> to >> get some guy from Cali to fix that error. I think they deleted the >> pathway >> or something because it interfered with the set. That was like 500 to fix >> or >> something. Maybe with the last update something happened again to this >> (RBase) software. I am not sure, but if you think you (they are talking >> about me fixing RBase that it appears they messed up) can fix the problem >> that would be awesome. >> ------------------------------ >> >> I am no computer genius, but I have used a ton of different >> programs/software and I do not understand how they would even think to >> release this . Set aside the fact it is so far from user friendly, it is >> seriously just a mess..... And they are about three months from their >> promise update date. The last update they did I think caused more issues >> than corrections to their previous issues. Maybe its better that they are >> taking so long for this update, give them the chance to make sure it is >> beneficial... LOL >> >> >> I cannot believe anyone would give them money for anything, they should >> be >> paying these poor dr's for being their guinea pigs and using this >> software. >> >> > >
