Rats, I have my plans for a carburetor that gets 150 mpg loaded on Google docs, I was hoping to sell it to GM for 10 million. I better encrypt it fast before someone steals it.
> > Seriously though, go read the license agreement for Google Docs. Google has > rights to your stuff and they can discontinue the service without notice.. > > Not implying that any of the "Cloud Services" operations could ever operate > under that scenario, but realistically, sensitive data needs to reside very > much displaced (read multiple layers of firewall) from internet access. > > > > : are becoming more evident. > : > : Javier, > : > : Javier Valencia, PE > : 913-829-0888 Office > : 913-915-3137 Cell > : 913-649-2904 Fax > : [email protected] > : -----Original Message----- > : From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MDRD > : Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:42 AM > : To: RBASE-L Mailing List > : Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > : > : LOL they were bragging about using cutting edge technology and programming > : language > : > : -------------------------------------------------- > : From: "Mike Byerley" <[email protected]> > : Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:04 AM > : To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> > : Subject: [RBASE-L] - OT: Re: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > : > : > > : > And if you read industry info lately, .NET may be in it's twilight > years > : > already. > : > > : > This nightmarishly bloated library would never work in the tablet / > phone > : > environment and lately, MS has said they are going to spend a couple > : > billion > : > dollars to spiff up their C++ development environment (WinC is its' > : > moniker) > : > to attract developers back to that language. They have already stopped > : > further meaningful development on VB.NET in favor of C#. > : > > : > MS is a little schizoid at the moment. Look for some changes at the top > : > of > : > the company in the coming months. > : > > : > > : > ----- Original Message ----- > : > From: "MDRD" <[email protected]> > : > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> > : > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:43 AM > : > Subject: [RBASE-L] - RBase vs the others SQL ?? > : > > : > > : > > : > Many of you may remember that my x distributor was trying to write my > app > : > in > : > SQL Exp and Dot Net Framework. They started in Mar 2007 and below are > : > some > : > comments for our customers that have tried the other "improved" program. > : > > : > As you can see by my other thread, if I can "fix" my other issue (that > : > only > : > involves a small % of our users) I have a great opportunity to leave the > : > Dot > : > Net program in the dust. > : > > : > The x distributor says he spent 2 million building this dream program... > : > LOL > : > .. I could have sold him my code for 1.5 mill > : > Also, he asked for my source code to so he could have another programmer > : > update the look and feel in Jan 2007, then a month later he starts pre > : > selling he new program... what a cheese ball. > : > > : > Marc > : > > : > > : > I don't want to sit here and rip on it too much, BUT... Reports and > : > financials do not even print the date they are for on them; only the > date > : > you printed. We got the software in Sept started running in Nov. We were > : > promised errors and things would be fixed by Christmas with updates, > : > didn't > : > happen that way. The update didn't come until the new year. With the > last > : > update they changed how the accounting worked and now it runs as side by > : > side program, which works ok for me cause I keep two computer screens > : > running side by side. Even so though, if I add a new patient in the > : > non-accounting side, I have to completely close the accounting software > : > before the patient will be added to accounting side. They have major > : > issues > : > with being able to make corrections to claims, if say an accident > occurred > : > while billing, I have to resort to the last software and submit the > : > corrected claim that way. Which is really sad, I think. The software is > : > extremely slow, and there are so many screens you have to go through to > : > make > : > one simple change for your patient. It just doesn't seem to be thought > out > : > very well, much less user friendly. I should prob stop now. > : > > : > > : > ------------------ > : > The software that we were using prior to couldn't submit most claims > : > electronically and hadn't had an update in years and was essentially > : > crashing more and more everyday. ----------------------------- > : > > : > When ir was installed they did something to our other software, I had > to > : > get some guy from Cali to fix that error. I think they deleted the > pathway > : > or something because it interfered with the set. That was like 500 to > fix > : > or > : > something. Maybe with the last update something happened again to this > : > (RBase) software. I am not sure, but if you think you (they are talking > : > about me fixing RBase that it appears they messed up) can fix the > problem > : > that would be awesome. > : > ------------------------------ > : > > : > I am no computer genius, but I have used a ton of different > : > programs/software and I do not understand how they would even think to > : > release this . Set aside the fact it is so far from user friendly, it is > : > seriously just a mess..... And they are about three months from their > : > promise update date. The last update they did I think caused more issues > : > than corrections to their previous issues. Maybe its better that they > are > : > taking so long for this update, give them the chance to make sure it is > : > beneficial... LOL > : > > : > > : > I cannot believe anyone would give them money for anything, they should > be > : > paying these poor dr's for being their guinea pigs and using this > : > software. > : > > : > > : > : > >
