Marco, Windows server 2008 and Microsoft RDP provide good results. No problems at all , even when only using ADSL
Tony -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marco Groeneveld Sent: dinsdag 7 augustus 2012 19:38 To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Net Work Speed Any experience which software to use on server and desktop to have best results (Citrix Client) ? Marco ----- Original Message ----- From: "A. Razzak Memon" <[email protected]> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 12:17 AM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Net Work Speed > At 01:11 PM 8/6/2012, Frank Taylor wrote: > >>Razzak, >> >>Definitely cannot wait to see these items at the conference. > > Frank, > > Me too! > > http://www.rbase.com/conference/ > > >>In between now and then may I ask a few questions ? >> >>1. What version of Windows TS are they using (2003 or 2008) and if both, >>do you see >>any difference in one over the other as far as occurrence of printing >>oddities, etc? > > Mixture of both 2003 and 2008 (R2). > > Make sure to install the latest drivers for every printer used on the > network. > > >>2. Does the Database have to reside on the TS to achieve these performance >>gains? > > Majority of my clients keep the database and applications (Compiled and > Non-Compiled) > on the same server. > > Two clients keep their database and applications behind the DMZ. > > >>3. What about OBDC connections, do these connections affect performance if >>they come >> from on or off the server? > > No problem if on the same domain, same or different server, with > mapped/UNC connection > to R:BASE 9.1/9.5 (64) databases. > > >>4. Lastly, RWeb Suite, are there any issues or performance reductions >>running a web >> server (Apache/PHP) off of the database ? > > None. > > We keep the web server separate from the terminal server with database and > applications. > > Dedicated Web server running Oterro 9.1/9.5 (64), Apache/PHP using > Mapped/UNC connection. > > >>We are looking at an upgrade to one of our divisions and changing all of >>the users over >>to a TS maybe something I will consider factoring into the project. > > From the operations side of running a business, there are really only two > things that > are important: time and money. The great thing about Terminal Services is > that it can > save you both. > > From a time-saving perspective, Terminal Services lets administrators > install, configure, > manage and maintain applications centrally on a few servers. This is > usually much faster > and easier to do than deploying applications on hundreds or thousands of > desktop machines > at different sites across an enterprise. > > Centrally-deployed R:BASE (Compiled and Non-Compiled) applications are > usually easier to > maintain (for example, patching and upgrading) and simpler to troubleshoot > when things > go wrong. As a result, downtime is reduced and users are more productive. > > Very Best R:egards, > > Razzak. > > www.rbase.com > www.facebook.com/rbase > >
