Javier,

Stephen's Canadian. Maybe he doesn't have as much experience with
government incompetence. :-)

Bill




On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Javier Valencia <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Stephen,
>
> While not completely true, in my experience it is mostly true. In most of
> the local government IT shops with whom I had dealings, as soon as an
> employee becomes competent he leaves for the private sector, and the ones
> left are those who cannot get a job anywhere else.
> I am still surprised how often I have to tell them how to do basic
> procedures that they should know and yet they don't
>
> Javier,
>
> Javier Valencia, PE
> O: 913-829-0888
> H: 913-397-9605
> C: 913-915-3137
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Markson
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:38 PM
> To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Using R:Base as front End
>
> Hi list,
>
> Let's remember that incompetence is not the exclusive province of
> government
> personnel and that not all government personnel should be tarred with the
> "incompetence" brush.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen Markson
> The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada
> 416.979.2431 x251
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim
> Belisle
> Sent: March-26-14 2:20 PM
> To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Using R:Base as front End
>
> Javier,
>
> There is a saying I learned many years ago.
> "If it don't make sense, there's a buck in it."
> Unfortunately that is so true in government.
>
> James Belisle
>
> Making Information Systems People Friendly Since 1990
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Javier
> Valencia
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:16 PM
> To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Using R:Base as front End
>
> Robert,
>
> Your comments are right on point.
> Unfortunately in most government projects, technical decisions are seldom
> based on technical merits; politics and personal agendas seem to take
> precedence, which I unfortunate since it is tax payer money that is being
> wasted.
> While the program in question is an engineering application, the entire RFP
> was written with zero input from engineering or end users.
> One of the component, whose specifications should be several pages long is
> summarized in two short paragraphs. I could bid a system that does one
> tenth
> of what the current system does, and as long as I am an ESRI partner and
> have native ODBC capability, it would meet the requirements of the RFP. The
> level of incompetence is unbelievable...the really scary part is they think
> they really know what they are doing.
> I just got off the phone with one of the top engineers at the agency, and
> the one that had worked on the development of the current system, and he
> was
> not even aware an RFP had been issued and he is now looking into the
> situation and he will move the concerns all the way to the very top, so
> there is some hope that the process will be stopped.
> Sometimes, the incompetence of government personnel boggles the mind.
>
> Javier,
>
> Javier Valencia, PE
> O: 913-829-0888
> H: 913-397-9605
> C: 913-915-3137
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rbase List
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:01 AM
> To: RBASE-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Using R:Base as front End
>
> Beg your pardon in advance for interject my thoughts here.
>
> I am a veteran user of R:Base since it's inception. I have worked as a
> consultant and/or outside developer for many large corporations including
> the Government.
>
> Today I do not do any type of development (sadly, I miss it!)  but I
> oversee
> many projects for the Federal Gov. and Private
>
> I had seen LARGE projects developed with ORACLE, MS-SQL and the like, and
> they all got something in common and I wish to share it with you:
>
> 1) They are very expensive
> 2) They require sophisticated planning because once code is implemented it
> is a nightmare to "Rewind and Re-write"
> 3) Usually if no in-house development is available then, very expensive
> outside developers will take the task with a hefty price-tag
> 4) Some of these tools I must say are NOT intuitive for those that work in
> the support team.
>
> There are many more issues that I could cite first hand, but let's go on.
>
> Enter R:Base, simple, elegant and VERY powerful (By the way...did anyone
> ever needed support from the OTHER guys...?). Here I do have a simple
> question for all of us, (I have compared Rbase in many applications with
> other products INCLUDING Oracle, and to be sincere (and trust me Im NOT
> biased) Rbase outperformed the competition and it was FAR cheaper to deploy
> and maintain.) does anyone there have any opportunity to do some similar
> head to head comparison?.
>
> No, Im not saying that the other software is/are inferior or not good, what
> Im saying is that cost/efficiency and maintenance/performance Rbase is one,
> if not the most obvious choice.
>
> Because I'm not in the developing side (for now) I do not have any dog in
> this fight, but, back when I was instrumental in making the specs or to
> choose a developing tool there was NEVER a hesitation, ask MasterCard, The
> Copeland Co,  Miami-Dade voters registration, US Cost Guard, 3M and the
> like, some of these applications still running after
> 10-12 years FLAWLESS and some have as many as 12,000,000 records.
>
> Enough said, perhaps you/we should show the ease of maintenance, the super
> speed and most of all proudly show the EXCELLENT and PROMPT technical
> support that our R:Base give, and I assure you that if you/we are good
> salespersons we will have no problem to introduce R:Base to the "reluctant
> base of potential clients".
>
> My advice is...keep on developing, try to teach the bulk of future
> programmers (do not fear competition) the power and easiness of a really
> mature and good tool like R:Base, the more we bring onboard the easier will
> be for us to "Convince and Show the Power" the broader the developer's base
> the easier is for all of us.
>
> Once again I wish to excuse my intrusion on this thread but it was a gut
> impulse that it is growing since R:base 4000 was my choice of tools for my
> pet project back when I was young and I knew that the world was going to be
> mine :).
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:59:37 -0400, A. Razzak Memon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > At 04:26 PM 3/25/2014, Javier Valencia wrote:
> >
> >> I know of no other application out there has our capabilities, so it
> >> is very likely that the RFP will require an MS SQL database as a way
> >> to keep us out. They are absolutely adamant that they do not want to
> >> use Oterro for ODBC connectivity.
> >>
> >> The bulk of the application is the front end, forms (200+) and
> >> reports (200+), views (100+) and programs, as the database structure
> >> itself (140 tables, 2700+ columns) is relatively easy to duplicate.
> >
> > Javier,
> >
> > Do you know how many R:BASE customers have tried other options, wasted
>
> > hundreds and thousands of dollars, and are still using R:BASE?
> >
> > Do you wonder why?
> >
> > If (a big IF) you have lived up to your customers high expectations,
> > have kept them up-to-date, and have provided them with every single
> > feature they have requested, you simply don't have to worry about
> this.
> > Let them dig their own hole and explore other options, and learn their
>
> > lesson, eventually appreciating what R:BASE eXtreme 9.5 (64) has to
> > offer today.
> >
> > Why R:BASE?
> > www.rbase.com/whyrbase.php
> >
> > Having said that, yes, you CAN use R:BASE eXtreme 9.5 (64) as
> > front-end to MS SQL Server and Oracle.
> >
> > R:BASE for Everyone:
> > http://www.rbase.com/rbg95/rbaseforeveryone.jpg
> > http://www.rbase.com/rbaseforeveryone_application.jpg
> >
> > 2014 SAT Sample Applications include a sample to illustrate the use of
>
> > such option using R:BASE eXtreme 9.5 (64).
> >
> > Good Luck and Very Best R:egards,
> >
> > Razzak.
> >
> > www.rbase.com
> > www.facebook.com/rbase
>
>
> --
>  From the Desk of Robert Rugilo, EME at Law Offices of David M. Garvin,
> P.A.
> Paralegal and IT Forensic Specialist
>
> The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
> confidential information It is intended only for the use of the
> person(s) named above If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> notified that any review dissemination distribution or duplication of this
> communication is strictly prohibited If you are not the intended recipient
> please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the
> original message.
>
>
>

Reply via email to