Bernie

Thanks - that's a BIG DUH. Sami take note!!

Razzak the other question - what does the change in CHKDSK FH imply - still
holds!


David Blocker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
781-784-1919
Fax: 781-784-1860
Cell: 339-206-0261
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernard Lis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 12:47 PM
Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: New installer - Thank you!!!


> David,
> They all show up on the screen, just move your slide bar to the right and
> you will see them.
>
> My question is how do we use these or are they automatically used.  Is
there
> a way to tell how many fh's we use as we zip thru our commands?
>
> Bernie Lis
> P.S.  Razzak, I think you opened up a can of worms -- now we want to know
> more.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David M. Blocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 10:57 AM
> Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: New installer - Thank you!!!
>
>
> >
> > OK, this email started out about one thing and ends up being about two.
> >
> > When you have ignorance it's best not to pretend. I did the CHKDSK fh
> > command in 6.5++ and in 7.1 build 77.  At first I couldn't see what I
was
> > supposed to be imagining.  In 6.5++ I see numbers from 1 - 64. In 7.1
> build
> > 77 I saw:
> >
> > 7 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
35
> 36
> > 37 38  (On the top line)
> > 263 264 265 266 on the second line
> >
> > But when I dragged over this on the R> prompt screen, pressed Ctrl C and
> > then pasted with Ctrl V I suddenly saw:
> >
> > 7  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28
29
> > 30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47
48
> > 49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66
67
> > 68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85
86
> > 87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99 100 101 102 103 104
105
> > 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
> 124
> > 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
> 143
> > 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161
> 162
> > 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180
> 181
> > 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199
> 200
> > 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218
> 219
> > 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237
> 238
> > 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256
> 257
> > 258 259 260 261 262
> > 263 264 265 266
> >
> > OK so two questions:
> >
> > 1.  Is the point that we have many more file handles?  If so, what does
> that
> > gain us?  The ability to handle more data at a time when connected to
> other
> > data sources or others are trying to handle connections to R:Base?
> >
> > 2.  What's up with the R> prompt display?  Why did I not see all the
> > numbers? (Width is set at 79; changing it did not change the display)
> >
> > Puzzled in Sharon, MA
> > David Blocker
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 781-784-1919
> > Fax: 781-784-1860
> > Cell: 339-206-0261
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "A. Razzak Memon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:38 PM
> > Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: New installer - Thank you!!!
> >
> >
> > >
> > > At 06:26 PM 8/27/2004 -0700, Larry Lustig wrote:
> > >
> > > > > 01. New low level I/O routines (RBIO.DLL) for
> > > > > improved performance.
> > > >
> > > >Can you suggest in what areas we should expect to
> > > >see this improved performance?  I'm asking primarily
> > > >because I'm not personally familiar with any areas
> > > >that look like they could possibly have their
> > > >performance improved.
> > >
> > >
> > > This would be most beneficial in a situation where
> > > you are connecting to the same database either
> > > directly using R:BASE 7.x/8.x, or via Oterro DSN
> > > when you have Disk Full or I/O -ERROR-s in a complex
> > > multi-user environment.
> > >
> > > To really see the difference, try the following cool
> > > test at the R> prompt. Just type the following and
> > > press [Enter].
> > >
> > > CHKDSK fh               -- file handles
> > >
> > > Notice the results in 6.x or 7.x (until update 76)
> > > and the latest Pre-Release (Update 77 08/27/2004).
> > >
> > > Notice the difference and imagine the possibilities!
> > >
> > > This is a MAJOR step forward to enhance R:BASE I/O
> > > routines for upcoming updates/versions as well as a
> > > few commercial products handling R:BASE applications
> > > on Desktop, InterNet, IntraNet, LAN/WAN, RDT using
> > > R:BASE 7.x, 8.0 or Oterro 3.x.
> > >
> > > Originally, the concept of enhanced I/O was implemented
> > > in R:BASE V-8 "Turbo" Private Beta, but our development
> > > team has decided to incorporate the same routines in
> > > current versions of R:BASE and Oterro. "RBIO" is designed
> > > to work with R:BASE 7.x/8.x and "OTIO" is designed to
> > > work with Oterro 3.x.
> > >
> > > Wayne Erickson, the head of R:Dream Team, will explain
> > > more technical details at the Fall 2004 R:BASE Developers'
> > > Conference. http://www.rbase.com/conference
> > >
> > > The same enhancement has been implemented in the latest
> > > private betas of Oterro 3.0 and R:BASE V-8 "Turbo".
> > >
> > > Hope that provides the insight you are not personally
> > > familiar with.
> > >
> > > Very Best R:egards,
> > >
> > > Razzak.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to