Maybe some photos would help?
On Sep 26, 8:03 am, Tim McNamara <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2009, at 7:11 AM, James Dinneen wrote:
>
> > --- On Fri, 9/25/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > hello all I'm selling my 55.5 cm all rounder frame the standover
> > height is just a little too tall for me it's about 33.5 inches. It is
> > in amazing shape no dents or dings a few scratches and chips of
> > paint. This is a waterford built bike burnt orange color it has a
> > 57.5 top tube ctoc and takes 700 c tires has fender eyelets no rack
> > eyelets. Frame and Fork only 1100. email me if you want photos.
> > A 33.5 inch standover height seems way too tall for a 55.5 seat
> > tube. Are you sure on that measurement?
>
> There are a couple of oddities in the description. First, All-
> Rounders of the Waterford era came with 26" wheels in all sizes; this
> might conceivably be a Long-Low rather than an All-Rounder. I was
> going to say that the top tube seemed awfully long for a 55.5 cm
> frame, but then I noticed that the OP measured center to center and
> Rivendell measures the seat tube center to top. This is probably
> really a 57.
>
> My 59.5 cm All-Rounder from the same era has a standover of 33 inches
> with 26 x 1.25.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
